These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23954186)

  • 1. Lead time and down-staging in the survival of cervical cancer cases detected by screening.
    Dugué PA; Rebolj M; Lynge E
    Prev Med; 2013 Oct; 57(4):403. PubMed ID: 23954186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: lead time and down-staging in the survival of cervical cancer cases detected by screening.
    Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Serraino D;
    Prev Med; 2013 Oct; 57(4):404-5. PubMed ID: 23954188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
    Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement of the cervical cancer screening program in Malaysia: a qualitative study.
    Abdullah F; Su TT
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(5):1359-66. PubMed ID: 21198293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Seamark CJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Oct; 48(435):1704. PubMed ID: 10071414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
    Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries.
    Dowling EC; Klabunde C; Patnick J; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Med Screen; 2010; 17(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 20956724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening and mortality from cervical cancer. Study shows importance of centralised organisation in screening.
    Adab R; McGhee S; Hedley A
    BMJ; 1999 Sep; 319(7210):642-3. PubMed ID: 10523097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
    Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for cervical cancer in French Guiana: screening rates from 2006 to 2011.
    Douine M; Roué T; Lelarge C; Adenis A; Thomas N; Nacher M
    Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2015 Dec; 108(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 26608273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [No effect of organized cervix cancer screening].
    Zahl PH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(11):1302; author reply 1302. PubMed ID: 18511980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of screening in preventing invasive cervical cancer: a case-control study in Milan, Italy.
    Berrino F; Gatta G; d'Alto M; Crosignani P; Riboli E
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):111-23. PubMed ID: 3570398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The state of organized cervical screening program in Hungary in 2006].
    Kovacs A; Dobrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
    Orv Hetil; 2007 Mar; 148(12):535-40. PubMed ID: 17444018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The use of interactive medical data transfer to increase effectiveness of a mass screening program].
    Knapp P; Zbroch T; Knapp P
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):896-903. PubMed ID: 15754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening. Testing times.
    Dignan K
    Nurs Times; 1993 Nov 3-9; 89(44):28-30. PubMed ID: 8233961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
    Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Creating favorable conditions for organized screening of cervical cancer].
    Baudier F
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():5-10. PubMed ID: 10989624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.