These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23954487)

  • 1. A systematic review of the reporting of sample size calculations and corresponding data components in observational functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.
    Guo Q; Thabane L; Hall G; McKinnon M; Goeree R; Pullenayegum E
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():172-81. PubMed ID: 23954487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations in human electrophysiology (EEG and ERP) studies: A systematic review and recommendations for increased rigor.
    Larson MJ; Carbine KA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jan; 111():33-41. PubMed ID: 27373837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reporting of observational clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: a systematic review.
    Guo Q; Parlar M; Truong W; Hall G; Thabane L; McKinnon M; Goeree R; Pullenayegum E
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94412. PubMed ID: 24755843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
    Fritz CO; Morris PE; Richler JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 21823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analyses.
    Desmond JE; Glover GH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2002 Aug; 118(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 12204303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI.
    Pruim RHR; Mennes M; Buitelaar JK; Beckmann CF
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():278-287. PubMed ID: 25770990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990-2012) and of latest practices (2017-2018) in high-impact journals.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JP
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117164. PubMed ID: 32679253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly?
    Maggard MA; O'Connell JB; Liu JH; Etzioni DA; Ko CY
    Surgery; 2003 Aug; 134(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 12947329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting multi-subject random effects in fMRI: advocating prevalence estimation.
    Rosenblatt JD; Vink M; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():113-21. PubMed ID: 23988271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On bias in the estimation of autocorrelations for fMRI voxel time-series analysis.
    Marchini JL; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2003 Jan; 18(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 12507446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential reporting bias in fMRI studies of the brain.
    David SP; Ware JJ; Chu IM; Loftus PD; Fusar-Poli P; Radua J; Munafò MR; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70104. PubMed ID: 23936149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical power and prediction accuracy in multisite resting-state fMRI connectivity.
    Dansereau C; Benhajali Y; Risterucci C; Pich EM; Orban P; Arnold D; Bellec P
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():220-232. PubMed ID: 28161310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.
    Kinney AR; Eakman AM; Graham JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 101(12):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 32272106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies.
    Liou M; Su HR; Lee JD; Aston JA; Tsai AC; Cheng PE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 16226893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intracranial volume estimated with commonly used methods could introduce bias in studies including brain volume measurements.
    Nordenskjöld R; Malmberg F; Larsson EM; Simmons A; Brooks SJ; Lind L; Ahlström H; Johansson L; Kullberg J
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():355-60. PubMed ID: 23827332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective peak inference: Unbiased estimation of raw and standardized effect size at local maxima.
    Davenport S; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116375. PubMed ID: 31866164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial smoothing of autocorrelations to control the degrees of freedom in fMRI analysis.
    Worsley KJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):635-41. PubMed ID: 15907321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) applied to exercise interventions in musculoskeletal trials demonstrated good rater agreement and incomplete reporting.
    Slade SC; Finnegan S; Dionne CE; Underwood M; Buchbinder R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 103():120-130. PubMed ID: 30055247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.