These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2395453)

  • 1. Evidence to the Nurses Pay Review Body on behalf of the National Association of Theatre Nurses 1990.
    NATNEWS; 1990 Jun; 27(6):4. PubMed ID: 2395453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence to the Pay Review Body on behalf of the National Association of Theatre Nurses.
    NATNEWS; 1988 Jun; 25(6):7. PubMed ID: 3412441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pay Review body: evidence submitted on behalf of the National Association of Theatre nurses.
    NATNEWS; 1984 May; 21(5):10-3. PubMed ID: 6564357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NATN evidence to the Nurses Pay Review Body.
    NATNEWS; 1987 May; 24(5):11. PubMed ID: 3648481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pay and conditions: the state of the nursing nation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):18. PubMed ID: 1450020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nurses' pay: lifting the lower grades.
    Gray J; Naish J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Sep; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 2510005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay special. Can nurses strike?
    Scott G
    Nurs Stand; 1995 Mar 15-21; 9(25):20. PubMed ID: 7727237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RCN wary of latest jobs probe: new approach to nurses' pay levels.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Jun; (352):1. PubMed ID: 6564370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RCM evidence to--the Pay Review Body for nursing and midwifery staffs and the professions allied to medicine 1985.
    Midwives Chron; 1985 Feb; 98(1165):suppl 1-30. PubMed ID: 3844596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Don't squeeze the nurses': College plea on pay.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Apr; (392):1. PubMed ID: 3845358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boost pay to match nurses' skills says RCN.
    Cohen P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Dec; (427):1. PubMed ID: 3853099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RCN in a spin over nurses' pay.
    Chamberlain P
    Nurs Times; 2001 May 3-9; 97(18):18. PubMed ID: 11957873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial views on pay review body.
    Ellis S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 Jan; (277):1. PubMed ID: 6550405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gearing up for the next pay review.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):1, 11. PubMed ID: 6565990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional pay: the nursing organisations' viewpoint.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Jan; 3(18):12-3. PubMed ID: 2494513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. College evidence calls for 'immediate and significant pay increases'.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 3. PubMed ID: 6569342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurses's pay: a solid case.
    Sylvester J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Oct; 4(5):22. PubMed ID: 2511481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Royal College of Nursing. Needs of nurses.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Dec; (427):4. PubMed ID: 3853101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.