200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23956112)
1. Different paths to sexual size dimorphism in two praying mantids, Pseudomantis albofimbriata and Hierodula majuscula.
Allen LE; Barry KL; Holwell GI
Insect Sci; 2014 Apr; 21(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 23956112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A test of the reproductive cost hypothesis for sexual size dimorphism in Yarrow's spiny lizard Sceloporus jarrovii.
Cox RM
J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1361-9. PubMed ID: 17032368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.
Herczeg G; Gonda A; Merilä J
J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 20202005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs.
Nali RC; Zamudio KR; Haddad CF; Prado CP
Am Nat; 2014 Dec; 184(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 25438173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpopulation Comparison of Sex-Biased Mortality and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Sea-Run Masu Salmon, Oncorhynchus masou.
Tamate T
Zoolog Sci; 2015 Aug; 32(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 26245223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex-specific selection and intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism.
Cox RM; Calsbeek R
Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):798-809. PubMed ID: 19796147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testosterone has opposite effects on male growth in lizards (Sceloporus spp.) with opposite patterns of sexual size dimorphism.
Cox RM; John-Alder HB
J Exp Biol; 2005 Dec; 208(Pt 24):4679-87. PubMed ID: 16326949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata.
Serrano-Meneses MA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Azpilicueta-Amorín M; González-Soriano E; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1259-73. PubMed ID: 18636976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incorporating an ontogenetic perspective into evolutionary theory of sexual size dimorphism.
Chou CC; Iwasa Y; Nakazawa T
Evolution; 2016 Feb; 70(2):369-84. PubMed ID: 26768067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.
Monroe MJ; South SH; Alonzo SH
J Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1793-803. PubMed ID: 26189727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual size dimorphism in caecilian amphibians: analysis, review and directions for future research.
Kupfer A
Zoology (Jena); 2009; 112(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 19433349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neither male gonadal androgens nor female reproductive costs drive development of sexual size dimorphism in lizards.
Starostová Z; Kubička L; Golinski A; Kratochvíl L
J Exp Biol; 2013 May; 216(Pt 10):1872-80. PubMed ID: 23393279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. You are what you eat: food limitation affects reproductive fitness in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid.
Barry KL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78164. PubMed ID: 24130901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual deception in a cannibalistic mating system? Testing the Femme Fatale hypothesis.
Barry KL
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Feb; 282(1800):20141428. PubMed ID: 25520352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Macroevolutionary pattern of sexual size dimorphism in geckos corresponds to intraspecific temperature-induced variation.
Starostová Z; Kubicka L; Kratochvíl L
J Evol Biol; 2010 Apr; 23(4):670-7. PubMed ID: 20487136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).
Hendry CR; Guiher TJ; Pyron RA
J Evol Biol; 2014 Apr; 27(4):760-71. PubMed ID: 24597708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development.
Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU; Puniamoorthy N
Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1189-99. PubMed ID: 27168489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.
De Lisle SP; Rowe L
Am Nat; 2013 Nov; 182(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 24107370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
