These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23956330)

  • 1. Advancement of the premaxilla with distraction osteogenesis.
    Cakmak F; Turk T; Sumer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 23956330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study.
    Qian L; Qian Y; Chen W
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):321. PubMed ID: 37226215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of postoperative midfacial deformity of chilopalatognathus by distraction osteogenesis with a self-constructed tooth-borne distraction device.
    Zhao SF; Tang EY; Hu QG; Yang XD; Da SJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1028-32. PubMed ID: 24705241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancement of mandibular symphysis with distraction osteogenesis.
    Turk T; Cakmak F; Sumer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 19201331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years.
    Chen PK; Por YC; Liou EJ; Chang FC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 20536369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior segmental distraction of the hypoplastic maxilla by a tooth borne device: a study on the movement of the segment.
    Okcu KM; Sencimen M; Karacay S; Bengi AO; Ors F; Dogan N; Gokce HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(8):817-22. PubMed ID: 19442488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: a preliminary report.
    Bengi O; Karaçay S; Akin E; Okçu KM; Olmez H; Mermut S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(6-7):302-10. PubMed ID: 17892943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.
    Wang XX; Wang X; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Jia YL; Zou BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1237-43. PubMed ID: 19720499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral tooth-borne device in adult Class II patients.
    El-Bialy TH; Razdolsky Y; Kravitz ND; Dessner S; Elgazzar RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1446-53. PubMed ID: 23790589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
    Baek SH; Lee JK; Lee JH; Kim MJ; Kim JR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17912117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Chua HD; Cheung LK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Premaxillary distraction osteogenesis with an individual tooth-borne appliance.
    Bengi AO; Gürton AO; Okcu KM; Aydintug YS
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 15264658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint.
    Gunbay T; Akay MC; Aras A; Gomel M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 19761921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.