98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23956330)
1. Advancement of the premaxilla with distraction osteogenesis.
Cakmak F; Turk T; Sumer M
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 23956330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study.
Qian L; Qian Y; Chen W
BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):321. PubMed ID: 37226215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of postoperative midfacial deformity of chilopalatognathus by distraction osteogenesis with a self-constructed tooth-borne distraction device.
Zhao SF; Tang EY; Hu QG; Yang XD; Da SJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):1028-32. PubMed ID: 24705241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advancement of mandibular symphysis with distraction osteogenesis.
Turk T; Cakmak F; Sumer M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 19201331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years.
Chen PK; Por YC; Liou EJ; Chang FC
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 20536369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anterior segmental distraction of the hypoplastic maxilla by a tooth borne device: a study on the movement of the segment.
Okcu KM; Sencimen M; Karacay S; Bengi AO; Ors F; Dogan N; Gokce HS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(8):817-22. PubMed ID: 19442488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: a preliminary report.
Bengi O; Karaçay S; Akin E; Okçu KM; Olmez H; Mermut S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(6-7):302-10. PubMed ID: 17892943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.
Wang XX; Wang X; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Jia YL; Zou BS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1237-43. PubMed ID: 19720499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
Bielawska H
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral tooth-borne device in adult Class II patients.
El-Bialy TH; Razdolsky Y; Kravitz ND; Dessner S; Elgazzar RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1446-53. PubMed ID: 23790589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
Baek SH; Lee JK; Lee JH; Kim MJ; Kim JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17912117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Chua HD; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Premaxillary distraction osteogenesis with an individual tooth-borne appliance.
Bengi AO; Gürton AO; Okcu KM; Aydintug YS
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 15264658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
Georgalis K; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
