These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices. Falk TH; Parsa V; Santos JF; Arehart K; Hazrati O; Huber R; Kates JM; Scollie S IEEE Signal Process Mag; 2015 Mar; 32(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 26052190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients. Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners. Hazrati O; Loizou PC Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 22356300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. USING MACHINE LEARNING TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF REVERBERATION AND NOISE IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS. Chu KM; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM; Mainsah BO Proc Meet Acoust; 2018 May; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 32582407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise. Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study. Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective and Subjective Measures of Simultaneous vs Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Kraaijenga VJC; Ramakers GGJ; Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Smit AL; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JHM; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EAM; Huinck WJ; Van Zanten GA; Grolman W JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Sep; 143(9):881-890. PubMed ID: 28655036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test. Polat Z; Bulut E; Ataş A Balkan Med J; 2016 Sep; 33(5):532-538. PubMed ID: 27761281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex. Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of reverberation on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant recipients. Kressner AA; Westermann A; Buchholz JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):1113. PubMed ID: 30180700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners. Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prior exposure to a reverberant listening environment improves speech intelligibility in adult cochlear implant listeners. Srinivasan NK; Tobey EA; Loizou PC Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 26843090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants. Rothpletz AM; Wightman FL; Kistler DJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):206-21. PubMed ID: 22436118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners. Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]