141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23956535)
1. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of Metapex, Metronidazole, BioPure MTAD, Aztreonam on Bacteroides fragilis and Propionibacterium acne.
Balakrishnan R; Dubey S; Dhole TK; Boruah LC; Srivastava S
J Conserv Dent; 2013 Jul; 16(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 23956535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of selected root canal irrigants on commonly isolated microorganisms in endodontic infection.
Dubey S; Saha SG; Rajkumar B; Dhole TK
Eur J Dent; 2017; 11(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28435359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial efficacy of metapex (calcium hydroxide with iodoform formulation) at different concentrations against selected microorganisms--an in vitro study.
Gautam S; Rajkumar B; Landge SP; Dubey S; Nehete P; Boruah LC
Nepal Med Coll J; 2011 Dec; 13(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 23016485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Emblica officinalis, Psidium guajava), MTAD, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study.
Dubey S
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2016; 6(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 26937369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Antibacterial and bactericidal activity of tinidazole against anaerobic bacteria comparing with metronidazole (author's transl)].
Ninomiya K; Kobata S; Imamura H; Mochizuki I; Watanabe K
Jpn J Antibiot; 1976 Mar; 29(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 1271586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Different Intracanal Medicaments against
Jayakkodi H; Reddy A; Krishnan V; Arora S; Cv RR; Joseph S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Feb; 20(2):179-183. PubMed ID: 31058632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.
Nagy E; Justesen US; Eitel Z; Urbán E;
Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():65-71. PubMed ID: 25464140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Antibacterial Efficacy of Biopure MTAD in Root Canal Contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis.
Kamberi B; Bajrami D; Stavileci M; Omeragiq S; Dragidella F; Koçani F
ISRN Dent; 2012; 2012():390526. PubMed ID: 22991671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected microorganisms.
Ayhan H; Sultan N; Cirak M; Ruhi MZ; Bodur H
Int Endod J; 1999 Mar; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 10371903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inducible metronidazole resistance in nim-positive and nim-negative bacteroides fragilis group strains after several passages metronidazole containing columbia agar plates.
Schaumann R; Petzold S; Fille M; Rodloff AC
Infection; 2005 Oct; 33(5-6):368-72. PubMed ID: 16258869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial effect of MTAD, Tetraclean, Cloreximid, and sodium hypochlorite on three common endodontic pathogens.
Giardino L; Savoldi E; Ambu E; Rimondini R; Palezona A; Debbia EA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):391. PubMed ID: 19884734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [In vitro activity of an ofloxacin-metronidazole combination against anaerobic bacteria. Kinetics of the action of metronidazole against Bacteroides fragilis].
Dubreuil L; Devos J; Beerens H; Romond C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 May; 36(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 3043345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria by the standardized disc diffusion method with special reference to bacteroides fragilis.
Dornbusch K; Nord CE; Olsson B
Scand J Infect Dis; 1975; 7(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 167431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong by the tentative EUCAST disc diffusion method.
Ho PL; Yau CY; Ho LY; Lai EL; Liu MC; Tse CW; Chow KH
Anaerobe; 2017 Oct; 47():51-56. PubMed ID: 28414107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effects of MTAD, NaOCl against selected endodontic pathogens.
Asna Ashari M; Fayaz F; Moezzi Ghadim N; Alim Marvasti L; Mehrabi Y
Iran Endod J; 2009; 4(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 23940488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro comparison of the antimicrobial effects of various endodontic medicaments on Enterococcus faecalis.
Davis JM; Maki J; Bahcall JK
J Endod; 2007 May; 33(5):567-9. PubMed ID: 17437873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study of obligate anaerobic bacterial sensitivity to tinidazole and metronidazole (determination of minimal inhibiting concentration--MIC)].
Kałowski M; Dybicki J; Kedzia A; Lukiański M
Wiad Lek; 1993 Mar; 46(5-6):211-5. PubMed ID: 8249400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimicrobial effect of conventional root canal medicaments vs propolis against Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans.
Mattigatti S; Ratnakar P; Moturi S; Varma S; Rairam S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 May; 13(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 22918001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to ticarcillin, cefoxitin, metronidazole, and related antimicrobial agents.
Henderson DK; Chow AW; Guze LB
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Apr; 11(4):679-82. PubMed ID: 856019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to antimicrobial agents.
Collignon PJ; Munro R; Morris G
Pathology; 1988 Jan; 20(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 3374973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
