BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957005)

  • 1. Normative findings for periocular anthropometric measurements among Chinese young adults in Hong Kong.
    Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():821428. PubMed ID: 23957005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normative anthropometric analysis and aesthetic indication of the ocular region for young Chinese adults.
    Li Q; Zhang X; Li K; Quan Y; Cai X; Xu S; Zhu F; Lu R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 254(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 26395280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of anthropometric measurements of anatomic structures of orbital soft tissue in 102 young han chinese adults.
    Wu XS; Jian XC; He ZJ; Gao X; Li Y; Zhong X
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010; 26(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 20592637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropometric Periocular Soft Tissue Analysis From Preadolescence to Young Adulthood: Photogrammetric Measurements.
    Ozdemir F; Golpinar M; Nahir M; Sahin B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):2045-2048. PubMed ID: 35119410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphometry of the soft tissues of the orbital region in Northern Sudanese persons.
    Sforza C; Elamin F; Tommasi DG; Dolci C; Ferrario VF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 May; 228(1-3):180.e1-11. PubMed ID: 23453642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anthropometric Analysis on the Ocular Region Morphology of Children and Young Adults in Chinese Han Population.
    Cai X; Chen Y; Li Q; Ma H; Tang Z; Nie C; Lu R
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019; 35(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 30365477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Craniofacial anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese babies: the eye.
    Fok TF; Hon KL; So HK; Wong E; Ng PC; Lee AK; Chang A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 12627795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normal periocular anthropometric measurements in an Australian population.
    Rana K; Beecher MB; Caltabiano C; Zhao Y; Verjans J; Selva D
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):2695-2701. PubMed ID: 36869978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Simple Standardized Three-Dimensional Anthropometry for the Periocular Region in a European Population.
    Guo Y; Schaub F; Mor JM; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 145(3):514e-523e. PubMed ID: 32097302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile.
    Cheung LK; Chan YM; Jayaratne YS; Lo J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):e56-73. PubMed ID: 21665497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periorbital Soft Tissue Anthropometric Analysis of Young Adults.
    Ozdemir T; Can FE; Isiklar S; Ercan I; Cankur NS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):e311-e318. PubMed ID: 28212130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereophotogrammetry-based facial depth measurements: a novel method for quantifying facial projection.
    Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
    Surg Innov; 2014 Feb; 21(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 23423724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniofacial anthropometry in a Turkish population.
    Evereklioglu C; Doganay S; Er H; Gunduz A; Tercan M; Balat A; Cumurcu T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Mar; 39(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 11879080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Schaub F; Hou X; Liu J; Ruan Y; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 257(11):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 31407036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3D anthropometric analysis of the orolabial region in Chinese young adults.
    Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):908-12. PubMed ID: 24094549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normal periocular anthropometric measurements in the Turkish population.
    Oztürk F; Yavas G; Inan UU
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 13(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16581619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of aging in periocular appearances by comparison of anthropometry between early and middle adulthoods in Chinese Han population.
    Ma H; Chen Y; Cai X; Tang Z; Nie C; Lu R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Dec; 72(12):2002-2008. PubMed ID: 31492581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal values of eye position in the Chinese population of Hong Kong.
    Quant JR; Woo GC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Feb; 69(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 1584554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.