271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2395711)
1. Logjam in the regions.
Tattam A
Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Every which way you lose.
Snell J
Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review--why and how to do it.
Jackson SA
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
Jacob D
Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The evaluation-notation].
Mizrahi MR
Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making performance appraisal work.
Noble JE
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
Martin V
Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Participative employee evaluation.
Breeden SA
J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Staff appraisal. Means of assessment.
Fletcher C
Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 3-9; 81(27):24-6. PubMed ID: 3848833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
Ryder JD
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In response to: Kahya E. (2006) A revision of a job evaluation system. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(3), 314-324.
Ransom E
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):570-1; author reply 572-3. PubMed ID: 17973721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 30/60/10 Rule of effective performance planning.
Cho JC; Armitstead JA
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2015; 55(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 25749261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consistency checking (2).
Adkins C
Community Pract; 2006 Aug; 79(8):261. PubMed ID: 16922036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the job performance of nursing home staff.
Sheridan JE; Fairchild TJ; Kaas M
Nurs Res; 1983; 32(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 6551761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Donkey work.
Robson K
Nurs Times; 1999 Jan 27-Feb 4; 95(4):64-6. PubMed ID: 10085965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The informal process. Discipline at work. Part One.
Hastings J
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 Sep; 6(5):20-3. PubMed ID: 10703443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
Fosbinder D; Vos H
J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The annual human resource review (a career-planning system).
Vosburgh RM
Pers J; 1980 Oct; 59(10):830-7. PubMed ID: 10248748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: staff development Part III.
Nauright LP
Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):44-6, 48. PubMed ID: 3648598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
