These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2395711)

  • 1. Logjam in the regions.
    Tattam A
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Every which way you lose.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staff appraisal. Means of assessment.
    Fletcher C
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 3-9; 81(27):24-6. PubMed ID: 3848833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
    Ryder JD
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In response to: Kahya E. (2006) A revision of a job evaluation system. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(3), 314-324.
    Ransom E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):570-1; author reply 572-3. PubMed ID: 17973721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 30/60/10 Rule of effective performance planning.
    Cho JC; Armitstead JA
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2015; 55(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 25749261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistency checking (2).
    Adkins C
    Community Pract; 2006 Aug; 79(8):261. PubMed ID: 16922036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the job performance of nursing home staff.
    Sheridan JE; Fairchild TJ; Kaas M
    Nurs Res; 1983; 32(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 6551761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Donkey work.
    Robson K
    Nurs Times; 1999 Jan 27-Feb 4; 95(4):64-6. PubMed ID: 10085965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The informal process. Discipline at work. Part One.
    Hastings J
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 Sep; 6(5):20-3. PubMed ID: 10703443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The annual human resource review (a career-planning system).
    Vosburgh RM
    Pers J; 1980 Oct; 59(10):830-7. PubMed ID: 10248748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: staff development Part III.
    Nauright LP
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):44-6, 48. PubMed ID: 3648598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.