These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2395711)

  • 61. Guidelines for evaluating department managers.
    Schoenhard WC
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Oct; 59(10):60-2. PubMed ID: 689658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Evaluating IPR.
    Hurst K
    Nurs Times; 1989 Sep 13-19; 85(37):60. PubMed ID: 2813118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Management techniques. On the critical path.
    Bryant S
    Health Serv J; 1987 Aug; 97(5062):906. PubMed ID: 10283073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Keeping in touch.
    Seymour J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):20-1. PubMed ID: 2395703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Re: Does anyone care?
    RCM Midwives; 2004 Sep; 7(9):402. PubMed ID: 15739742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Evaluation of the school of nursing dean.
    Dittmar SS; Stuart CT; Elder RG
    J Nurs Educ; 1990 Jun; 29(6):283-5. PubMed ID: 2165149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A model workplace: creating an effective nursing environment.
    Lanser EG
    Healthc Exec; 2001; 16(4):6-11. PubMed ID: 11434140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Faculty status for clinician-educators: guidelines for evaluation and promotion.
    Jacobs MB
    Acad Med; 1993 Feb; 68(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 8431229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The application of assessment techniques.
    Fink CA
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 3368150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Staying clear of the law.
    Boris LL
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):29-37. PubMed ID: 2640599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
    Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
    Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Managing performance.
    Ellis J
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2008 Apr; 15(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18444380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Face up to doing the dreaded appraisals.
    Gulati S
    Nurs Times; 2012 Mar 13-19; 108(11):33. PubMed ID: 22536716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Peer review in performance appraisal.
    Mann LM; Barton CF; Presti MT; Hirsch JE
    Nurs Adm Q; 1990; 14(4):9-14. PubMed ID: 2385384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.