These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957142)

  • 1. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
    Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.