These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957280)

  • 1. The language of magnitude comparison.
    Matthews WJ; Dylman AS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):510-20. PubMed ID: 23957280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. If John is taller than Jake, where is John? Spatial inference from magnitude comparison.
    Skylark WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1113-1129. PubMed ID: 29389180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The dimensional arrow: agreement in directional mapping of dimensions among Mandarin Chinese- and English-speakers.
    Evans L; Tsai PS; Wu DH; Lien YW; Gattis M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1729-38. PubMed ID: 23425427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies.
    Shaki S; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 22288694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing pluralities.
    Scontras G; Graff P; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 22245032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of expectancy in comparative judgments.
    Shoben EJ; Sailor KM; Wang MY
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 2913453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mental representation of the magnitude of symbolic and nonsymbolic ratios in adults.
    Meert G; Grégoire J; Seron X; Noël MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):702-24. PubMed ID: 22217316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Language effects in magnitude comparison: small, but not irrelevant.
    Nuerk HC; Weger U; Willmes K
    Brain Lang; 2005 Mar; 92(3):262-77. PubMed ID: 15721959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
    Nagata H; Bain B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anchors aweigh: a demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming.
    Oppenheimer DM; LeBoeuf RA; Brewer NT
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 17286970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnitude comparisons distort mental representations of magnitude.
    Choplin JM; Hummel JE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):270-86. PubMed ID: 12049244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dedicated comparatives aid comparisons of magnitude: a study with Pitjantjatjara-English bilinguals.
    Greenacre L; Defina R; Akbar S; Garcia JE
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1418797. PubMed ID: 39345946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of and the relation between non-symbolic numerical distance effects in comparison, same-different judgments and priming.
    Sasanguie D; Defever E; Van den Bussche E; Reynvoet B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 21075357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Categorical perception of emotional facial expressions does not require lexical categories.
    Sauter DA; LeGuen O; Haun DB
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1479-83. PubMed ID: 22004379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.
    Chambers CG; Cooke H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 19586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus alignments in the selection of bigger rectangles by four- and five-year-old children.
    Shimizu M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1255-61. PubMed ID: 9450279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of part-whole information in reasoning about relative size.
    Sailor KM; Shoben EJ
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):585-96. PubMed ID: 10946542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit and explicit processing of kanji and kana words and non-words studied with fMRI.
    Thuy DH; Matsuo K; Nakamura K; Toma K; Oga T; Nakai T; Shibasaki H; Fukuyama H
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):878-89. PubMed ID: 15528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's use of nonegocentric standards in judgments of functional size.
    Gelman SA; Ebeling KS
    Child Dev; 1989 Aug; 60(4):920-32. PubMed ID: 2758886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.