These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957307)

  • 21. Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety-linked attention bias in visual search.
    Dodd HF; Vogt J; Turkileri N; Notebaert L
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 122():13-20. PubMed ID: 26844869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A cross-cultural investigation into the influence of eye gaze on working memory for happy and angry faces.
    Gregory SEA; Langton SRH; Yoshikawa S; Jackson MC
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Dec; 34(8):1561-1572. PubMed ID: 32576091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neutral face distractors differentiate performance between depressed and healthy adolescents during an emotional working memory task.
    Tavitian LR; Ladouceur CD; Nahas Z; Khater B; Brent DA; Maalouf FT
    Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2014 Aug; 23(8):659-67. PubMed ID: 24248754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Switching associations between facial identity and emotional expression: a behavioural and ERP study.
    Willis ML; Palermo R; Burke D; Atkinson CM; McArthur G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Mar; 50(1):329-39. PubMed ID: 19962443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Remembering who was where: A happy expression advantage for face identity-location binding in working memory.
    Spotorno S; Evans M; Jackson MC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1365-1383. PubMed ID: 29672119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sustained visual attention for competing emotional stimuli in social anxiety: An eye tracking study.
    Liang CW; Tsai JL; Hsu WY
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():178-185. PubMed ID: 27569741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dopamine boosts memory for angry faces in Parkinson's disease.
    Subramanian L; Hindle JV; Jackson MC; Linden DE
    Mov Disord; 2010 Dec; 25(16):2792-9. PubMed ID: 20960479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.
    Maxwell JS; Shackman AJ; Davidson RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1386-95. PubMed ID: 16197692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye gaze influences working memory for happy but not angry faces.
    Jackson MC
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Jun; 32(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28665181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sad expressions during encoding attenuate recognition of facial identity in visual working memory: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Liu M; Zhou L; Wang X; Ye B
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Sep; 34(6):1271-1283. PubMed ID: 32046591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eye-movement assessment of the time course in facial expression recognition: Neurophysiological implications.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 9(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 19897793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.
    Lee HJ; Cho YS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1231-1243. PubMed ID: 30977105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli.
    Bannerman RL; Hibbard PB; Chalmers K; Sahraie A
    Emotion; 2012 Dec; 12(6):1384-92. PubMed ID: 22775132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of happy and angry faces on working memory in depressed adolescents.
    Wante L; Mueller SC; Cromheeke S; Braet C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 May; 169():59-72. PubMed ID: 29342446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Faces are special, but facial expressions aren't: Insights from an oculomotor capture paradigm.
    Devue C; Grimshaw GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1438-1452. PubMed ID: 28451999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rapid communication: Global-local processing affects recognition of distractor emotional faces.
    Srinivasan N; Gupta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 21347993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facing recovery: Emotional bias in working memory, rumination, relapse, and recurrence of major depression; an experimental paradigm conducted five years after first episode of major depression.
    Ronold EH; Joormann J; Hammar Å
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2020; 27(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 30646773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Double attention bias for positive and negative emotional faces in clinical depression: evidence from an eye-tracking study.
    Duque A; Vázquez C
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Mar; 46():107-14. PubMed ID: 25305417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emotion-cognition interactions in schizophrenia: Implicit and explicit effects of facial expression.
    Linden SC; Jackson MC; Subramanian L; Wolf C; Green P; Healy D; Linden DE
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19945472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The interrelations between verbal working memory and visual selection of emotional faces.
    Grecucci A; Soto D; Rumiati RI; Humphreys GW; Rotshtein P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 19445604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.