BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957509)

  • 1. Missing data and censoring in the analysis of progression-free survival in oncology clinical trials.
    Denne JS; Stone AM; Bailey-Iacona R; Chen TT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):951-70. PubMed ID: 23957509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research outcomes and recommendations for the assessment of progression in cancer clinical trials from a PhRMA working group.
    Stone AM; Bushnell W; Denne J; Sargent DJ; Amit O; Chen C; Bailey-Iacona R; Helterbrand J; Williams G;
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 47(12):1763-71. PubMed ID: 21435858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating and adjusting for premature censoring of progression-free survival.
    Rothmann M; Koti K; Lee KY; Lu HL; Shen YL; Zhang JJ; Jin M; Zhou H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1091-105. PubMed ID: 23957518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missing data and measurement variability in assessing progression-free survival endpoint in randomized clinical trials.
    Sridhara R; Mandrekar SJ; Dodd LE
    Clin Cancer Res; 2013 May; 19(10):2613-20. PubMed ID: 23669421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it time to abandon complete blinded independent central radiological evaluation of progression in registration trials?
    Pignatti F; Hemmings R; Jonsson B
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 47(12):1759-62. PubMed ID: 21641204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of sensitivity analyses in assessing progression-free survival in late-stage oncology trials.
    Bhattacharya S; Fyfe G; Gray RJ; Sargent DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(35):5958-64. PubMed ID: 19826121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of discordance measures in oncology studies with blinded independent central review of progression-free survival using an observational error model.
    Mannino FV; Amit O; Lahiri S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):971-85. PubMed ID: 23957510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blinded independent central review of progression in cancer clinical trials: results from a meta-analysis.
    Amit O; Mannino F; Stone AM; Bushnell W; Denne J; Helterbrand J; Burger HU
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 47(12):1772-8. PubMed ID: 21429737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contemporary phase III clinical trial endpoints in advanced ovarian cancer: assessing the pros and cons of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
    Tate Thigpen J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jan; 136(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 25455732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of audit methodologies for bias evaluation of tumor progression in oncology clinical trials.
    Zhang JJ; Zhang L; Chen H; Murgo AJ; Dodd LE; Pazdur R; Sridhara R
    Clin Cancer Res; 2013 May; 19(10):2637-45. PubMed ID: 23532893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of statistical issues with progression-free survival as an interval-censored time-to-event endpoint.
    Sun X; Li X; Chen C; Song Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):986-1003. PubMed ID: 23957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
    Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical methods for a phase II oncology trial with a growth modulation index (GMI) endpoint.
    Kovalchik S; Mietlowski W
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 20920605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of censoring on conclusions of trials for women with metastatic breast cancer.
    Templeton AJ; Ace O; Amir E; Vera-Badillo F; Ocana A; Pond GR; Tannock IF
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Apr; 51(6):721-4. PubMed ID: 25728257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why overall survival should not be the sole valid primary endpoint of phase 3 ovarian cancer chemotherapy trials.
    Markman M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Aug; 106(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 17662376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of progression-free survival in oncology trials: some common statistical issues.
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 17243095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of tumor burden versus progression-free survival for Phase II decision making.
    Fridlyand J; Kaiser LD; Fyfe G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 21266203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommendations for clinical trials of off-label drugs used to treat advanced-stage cancer.
    Mullins CD; Montgomery R; Abernethy AP; Hussain A; Pearson SD; Tunis S;
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Feb; 30(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 22253467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General and statistical hierarchy of appropriate biologic endpoints.
    Sargent D
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 May; 20(6 Suppl 5):5-9. PubMed ID: 16773839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.