561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957517)
1. Randomized two-stage Phase II clinical trial designs based on Barnard's exact test.
Shan G; Ma C; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23957517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exact two-stage designs for phase II activity trials with rank-based endpoints.
Wilding GE; Shan G; Hutson AD
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Mar; 33(2):332-41. PubMed ID: 22074983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of adaptive designs for single-armed phase II oncology trials.
Kieser M; Englert S
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):602-15. PubMed ID: 24905363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Group-sequential methods for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
Stallard N
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):787-801. PubMed ID: 21516569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal designs for two-arm, phase II clinical trial design with multiple constraints.
Mayo MS; Mahnken JD; Soong SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):106-24. PubMed ID: 20077252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On group sequential designs comparing two binomial proportions.
Kepner JL
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 20077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs for Phase II oncology trials.
Sun LZ; Chen C; Patel K
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 19384690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A flexible multi-stage design for phase II oncology trials.
Tan MT; Xiong X
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 22328328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytical approach to assess the predictive value of biomarkers in Phase II decision making.
Nikolakopoulos S; van der Wal WM; Roes KC
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1106-23. PubMed ID: 23957519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-stage k-sample designs for the ordered alternative problem.
Shan G; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 22408050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical guidelines for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that use Bayesian methods.
Kimani PK; Glimm E; Maurer W; Hutton JL; Stallard N
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2068-85. PubMed ID: 22437262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive designs for single-arm phase II trials in oncology.
Englert S; Kieser M
Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 22411839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision making from Phase II to Phase III and the probability of success: reassured by "assurance"?
Carroll KJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1188-200. PubMed ID: 23957523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
Jung SH
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for proper handling of overrunning and underrunning in phase II designs for oncology trials.
Englert S; Kieser M
Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2128-37. PubMed ID: 25781860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer.
Karrison TG; Maitland ML; Stadler WM; Ratain MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1455-61. PubMed ID: 17895472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An efficient algorithm to determine the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in oncology clinical trials.
Zhang Y; Mietlowski W; Chen B; Wang Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21191854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
Polley MY; Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
