These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957568)
1. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment. White PA Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty. Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments. Stephan S; Waldmann MR Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104924. PubMed ID: 34673301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment. Perales JC; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The probability of causal conditionals. Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning. Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information. White PA Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment. White PA Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The causal asymmetry. White PA Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):132-47. PubMed ID: 16478304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning. Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments. Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes. Tangen JM; Allan LG Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning. Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]