These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957665)

  • 1. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferences of color and lip position for facial attractiveness by laypersons and orthodontists.
    Shi Q; Zheng H; Hu R
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2016; 10():355-61. PubMed ID: 27051277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position.
    Chong HT; Thea KW; Descallar J; Chen Y; Dalci O; Wong R; Darendeliler MA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 23914821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles.
    Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic smile preferences and the orientation of the maxillary occlusal plane.
    Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Naylor WP; Maveli TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 23217467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations.
    Farrow AL; Zarrinnia K; Azizi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 8362785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of forehead and neck positions on profile esthetics.
    Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Roeinpeikar M
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 23150873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue profile analysis in a sample of South African Blacks with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2007 Jun; 62(5):206, 208-10, 212. PubMed ID: 17886588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial profile perceptions in a group of South African blacks.
    Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2007 May; 62(4):160, 162-7. PubMed ID: 17907584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the frontal esthetic preferences in the lower facial portion of Koreans and Caucasians.
    Kang YG; Lee YH; Kook YA; Kim SH; Sinclair PM
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19582252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria.
    Melo AR; Conti ACCF; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Didier V; Valarelli DP; Capelozza Filho L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 28444021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians.
    Mejia-Maidl M; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 16448237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of esthetic crown lengthening on perceptions of a patient's attractiveness, friendliness, trustworthiness, intelligence, and self-confidence.
    Malkinson S; Waldrop TC; Gunsolley JC; Lanning SK; Sabatini R
    J Periodontol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1126-33. PubMed ID: 23137007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.
    Al Taki A; Guidoum A
    J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24987664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.