101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23957730)
1. Comparison of volunteers' experience of using, and accuracy of reading, different types of home pregnancy test formats.
Pike J; Godbert S; Johnson S
Expert Opin Med Diagn; 2013 Sep; 7(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 23957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.
Johnson S; Cushion M; Bond S; Godbert S; Pike J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 25274958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of accuracy and certainty of results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter.
Tomlinson C; Marshall J; Ellis JE
Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Jun; 24(6):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18457603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a digital ovulation test with three popular line ovulation tests to investigate user accuracy and certainty.
Johnson S; Ellis J; Godbert S; Ali S; Zinaman M
Expert Opin Med Diagn; 2011 Nov; 5(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 23484745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Self pregnancy testing in an urban family planning clinic: promising results for a new approach to contraceptive follow-up.
Estes CM; Ramirez J; Tiezzi L; Westhoff C
Contraception; 2008 Jan; 77(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 18082665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a home-based device for giving an early estimate of pregnancy duration compared with reference methods.
Johnson SR; Godbert S; Perry P; Parsons P; Roberts L; Buchanan P; Larsen J; Alonzo TA; Zinaman M
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1635-41.e1. PubMed ID: 24074759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration.
Johnson S; Shaw R; Parkinson P; Ellis J; Buchanan P; Zinaman M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Feb; 27(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 21175374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Home pregnancy tests in the hands of the intended user.
Boxer J; Weddell S; Broomhead D; Hogg C; Johnson S
J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2019; 40(6):642-652. PubMed ID: 31556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Update on pregnancy testing.
Fletcher JL
Prim Care; 1986 Dec; 13(4):667-77. PubMed ID: 3541014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of home pregnancy tests at the time of missed menses.
Cole LA; Khanlian SA; Sutton JM; Davies S; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 14749643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical trial of 2 highly sensitive pregnancy tests--Tandem ICON HCG-urine and OPCO One-step Pacific Biotech].
Lauszus FF
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Jul; 154(30):2069-70. PubMed ID: 1509578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of low urine specific gravity on pregnancy testing.
Neinstein L; Harvey F
J Am Coll Health; 1998 Nov; 47(3):138-9. PubMed ID: 9830821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Hook-like effect" causes false-negative point-of-care urine pregnancy testing in emergency patients.
Griffey RT; Trent CJ; Bavolek RA; Keeperman JB; Sampson C; Poirier RF
J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 44(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 21835572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reagent strip testing is not sensitive for the screening of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women.
Lumbiganon P; Chongsomchai C; Chumworathayee B; Thinkhamrop J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Aug; 85(8):922-7. PubMed ID: 12403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of home pregnancy test kits.
Latman NS; Bruot BC
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1989; 23(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 2655796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Myth or fact: can women self-diagnose pregnancy?
Bachmann GA
J Med Soc N J; 1984 Oct; 81(10):857-8. PubMed ID: 6594525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a semi-quantitative urine pregnancy test compared to serum beta-hCG measurement: a possible screening tool for ongoing pregnancy after medication abortion.
Grossman D; Berdichevsky K; Larrea F; Beltran J
Contraception; 2007 Aug; 76(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 17656178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Home and laboratory pregnancy-testing kits.
Wheeler M
Prof Nurse; 1999 May; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 10532033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gold nanoparticle as an alternative tool for a urine pregnancy test.
Rojanathanes R; Sereemaspun A; Pimpha N; Buasorn V; Ekawong P; Wiwanitkit V
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 47(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 18935992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
