561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23958142)
1. Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.
Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 23958142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Writing for publication: avoiding common ethical pitfalls.
Siedlecki SL; Montague M; Schultz J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 18344788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial [the emperor of all academic and cultural maladies in scientific writing: plagiarism and auto-plagiarism].
Zaenker KS
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets; 2012 Feb; 11(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22309078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Plagiarism.
Manogue M; Rohlin M; Baum B; Winning T;
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Nov; 13(4):189. PubMed ID: 19824953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Publication dilemmas.
Hughes G
Emerg Med J; 2007 Sep; 24(9):610. PubMed ID: 17711931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anaesthetics journals retract further articles after ethics approval is found lacking.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2019. PubMed ID: 22415958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.
Resnik DB; Dinse GE
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jan; 39(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22942373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2010 Dec; 51(12):908-12. PubMed ID: 21221494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Avoiding unethical writing practices.
Roig M
Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3385-7. PubMed ID: 22750724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2012 Jan; 48(1):1. PubMed ID: 22188040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics in publication.
Wallace MB; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Jul; 47(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 26099116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication ethics and the ghost management of medical publication.
Sismondo S; Doucet M
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):273-83. PubMed ID: 19222451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.
Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and clearly involves intention to deceive.
Traystman RJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):291. PubMed ID: 15729286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
