These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Complications and conversions of upper tract urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS): multicentre experience: results from the NOTES Working Group. Irwin BH; Cadeddu JA; Tracy CR; Kim FJ; Molina WR; Rane A; Sundaram CP; Raybourn JH; Stein RJ; Gill IS; Kavoussi LR; Richstone L; Desai MM BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(8):1284-9. PubMed ID: 20840326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patterns and predictors of laparoscopic complications in pediatric urology: the role of ongoing surgical volume and access techniques. Passerotti CC; Nguyen HT; Retik AB; Peters CA J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):681-5. PubMed ID: 18554647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The feasibility of robotic urologic surgery in infants and toddlers. Srougi V; Yorioka M; Sanchez DC; Onal B; Houck CS; Nguyen HT J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Dec; 9(6 Pt B):1198-203. PubMed ID: 23782875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic management of benign mid and distal ureteral strictures and comparison with laparoscopic approaches at a single institution. Baldie K; Angell J; Ogan K; Hood N; Pattaras JG Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 22840857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: multi-institutional analysis of risk factors for conversion and postoperative complications. Autorino R; Kaouk JH; Yakoubi R; Rha KH; Stein RJ; White WM; Stolzenburg JU; Cindolo L; Liatsikos E; Rais-Bahrami S; Volpe A; Han DH; Derweesh IH; Lee SW; Abdel-Karim AM; Branco A; Greco F; Allaf M; Sotelo R; Kallidonis P; Jeong BC; Best S; Bazzi W; Pierorazio P; Elsalmy S; Rane A; Han WK; Yang B; Schips L; Molina WR; Fornara P; Terrone C; Giedelman C; Lee JY; Crouzet S; Haber GP; Richstone L; Yinghao S; Kim FJ; Cadeddu JA J Urol; 2012 Jun; 187(6):1989-94. PubMed ID: 22498207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Pediatric Urological Literature. Aksenov LI; Granberg CF; Gargollo PC J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):1010-1016. PubMed ID: 31855124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to decide which infant can have robotic surgery? Just do the math. Finkelstein JB; Levy AC; Silva MV; Murray L; Delaney C; Casale P J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Aug; 11(4):170.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25824875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies]. Pereira Arias JG; Gamarra Quintanilla M; Leibar Tamayo A; Astobieta Odriozola A; Ibarluzea González G Actas Urol Esp; 2010 May; 34(5):428-39. PubMed ID: 20470715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic urological surgery in patients with prior abdominal operations is not associated with increased complications. Nazemi T; Galich A; Smith L; Balaji KC Int J Urol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 16643618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transoral robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy in the pediatric population. Leonardis RL; Duvvuri U; Mehta D JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Oct; 139(10):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24135744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Casale P Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic urological surgery: incidence of reoperation and complications. Azawi NH; Rohrsted M; Poulsen J; Lund L; Kromann-Andersen B; Olsen LH Scand J Urol; 2019 Feb; 53(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 30880535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]