These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23959611)

  • 21. A technique for multiple-cell chromosome karyotyping.
    Granlund GH; Zack GW; Young IT; Eden M
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1976 Jan; 24(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 1254914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automated identification of abnormal metaphase chromosome cells for the detection of chronic myeloid leukemia using microscopic images.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Chen X; Liu H
    J Biomed Opt; 2010; 15(4):046026. PubMed ID: 20799828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A versatile image analysis approach for simultaneous chromosome identification and localization of FISH probes.
    Christian A; McNiel E; Robinson J; Drabek R; LaRue S; Waldren C; Bedford J
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1998; 82(3-4):172-9. PubMed ID: 9858810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Centromere attribute integration based chromosome polarity assignment.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Caldwell CW; Gader P
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():284-8. PubMed ID: 8947673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of rat chromosomes.
    Buwe A; Steinlein C; Koehler MR; Bar-Am I; Katzin N; Schmid M
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2003; 103(1-2):163-8. PubMed ID: 15004481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Algorithms for modeling structural changes in human chromosomes.
    Yang X; Wu W; Tseng CC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 23148917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mathematical approach for segmenting chromosome clusters in metaspread images.
    Devaraj S; Madian N; Suresh S
    Exp Cell Res; 2022 Sep; 418(1):113251. PubMed ID: 35691379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhancement of the classification of multichannel chromosome images using support vector machines.
    Karvelis PS; Fotiadis DI; Georgiou I; Sakaloglou P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3601-4. PubMed ID: 19964307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Karyotyping human chromosomes by optical and X-ray ptychography methods.
    Shemilt L; Verbanis E; Schwenke J; Estandarte AK; Xiong G; Harder R; Parmar N; Yusuf M; Zhang F; Robinson IK
    Biophys J; 2015 Feb; 108(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 25650937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Karyotyping human and mouse cells using probes from single-sorted chromosomes and open source software.
    Potapova TA; Unruh JR; Box AC; Bradford WD; Seidel CW; Slaughter BD; Sivagnanam S; Wu Y; Li R
    Biotechniques; 2015 Dec; 59(6):335-6, 338, 340-2 passim. PubMed ID: 26651513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
    Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
    Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Classification of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) images with sparse representation.
    Cao H; Deng HW; Li M; Wang YP
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Jun; 11(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22665392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Highly comprehensive karyotype analysis by a combination of spectral karyotyping (SKY), microdissection, and reverse painting (SKY-MD).
    Weimer J; Koehler MR; Wiedemann U; Attermeyer P; Jacobsen A; Karow D; Kiechl M; Jonat W; Arnold N
    Chromosome Res; 2001; 9(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 11448041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Operator-assisted semi-automatic karyotyping of banded metaphases.
    Wulf HC
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1977; 19(2-3):146-58. PubMed ID: 908202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases using kernel nearest-neighbor algorithm.
    Yu K; Ji L
    Cytometry; 2002 Aug; 48(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 12210144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Normalization of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) images for improving color karyotyping.
    Wang YP; Castleman KR
    Cytometry A; 2005 Apr; 64(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 15729736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fully automatic chromosome segmentation.
    Ji L
    Cytometry; 1994 Nov; 17(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 7851156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1911-4. PubMed ID: 19163063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spectral karyotyping refines cytogenetic diagnostics of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities.
    Schröck E; Veldman T; Padilla-Nash H; Ning Y; Spurbeck J; Jalal S; Shaffer LG; Papenhausen P; Kozma C; Phelan MC; Kjeldsen E; Schonberg SA; O'Brien P; Biesecker L; du Manoir S; Ried T
    Hum Genet; 1997 Dec; 101(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 9439652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.