These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23961982)

  • 1. On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: is the syntactic positive shift a member of the p300 family?
    Osterhout L; McKinnon R; Bersick M; Corey V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1996 Nov; 8(6):507-26. PubMed ID: 23961982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words.
    Münte TF; Matzke M; Johannes S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1997 May; 9(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 23965010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.
    Osterhout L
    Brain Lang; 1997 Oct; 59(3):494-522. PubMed ID: 9299074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. N400 and P600 or the role of the ERP correlates in sentence comprehension: some applications to the Italian language.
    Balconi M; Pozzoli U
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):268-302. PubMed ID: 15248594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli.
    Balconi M; Pozzoli U
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):71-98. PubMed ID: 15968921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.
    Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Matzke M; Wieringa BM; Johannes S
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Mar; 36(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 9622187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes.
    Osterhout L; Bersick M; McLaughlin J
    Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 9184479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Neville H; Nicol JL; Barss A; Forster KI; Garrett MF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1991; 3(2):151-65. PubMed ID: 23972090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study.
    Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Vespignani F; De Vincenzi M; Job R; Ciccarelli L; Palomba D; Stegagno L
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 322(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11958830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological Correlates of Second-Language Syntactic Processes Are Related to Native and Second Language Distance Regardless of Age of Acquisition.
    Díaz B; Erdocia K; de Menezes RF; Mueller JL; Sebastián-Gallés N; Laka I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():133. PubMed ID: 26903930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing.
    Hagoort P; Brown CM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1999 Nov; 28(6):715-28. PubMed ID: 10510866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generating predictions: lesion evidence on the role of left inferior frontal cortex in rapid syntactic analysis.
    Jakuszeit M; Kotz SA; Hasting AS
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2861-74. PubMed ID: 23890826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations.
    Rösler F; Pütz P; Friederici A; Hahne A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1993; 5(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 23972222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional Linking Between Negative and Positive ERPs for Syntactic Processing in Japanese: Mutual Enhancement, Syntactic Prediction, and Working Memory Constraints.
    Tokimoto S; Miyaoka Y; Tokimoto N
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2744. PubMed ID: 31920802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming.
    Nobre AC; McCarthy G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 23964974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. P600 related to rule violation in an arithmetic task.
    Núñez-Peña MI; Honrubia-Serrano ML
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 18(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 14736572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. States of indecision in the brain: ERP reflections of syntactic agreement violations versus visual degradation.
    van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ; Kolk HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1383-96. PubMed ID: 23583967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Syntactic processing modulates the theta rhythm of the human EEG.
    Bastiaansen MC; van Berkum JJ; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1479-92. PubMed ID: 12414287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical expertise modulates early processing of syntactic violations in language.
    Fitzroy AB; Sanders LD
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():603. PubMed ID: 23335905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.