These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23962332)

  • 1. Independent attentional scanning in the separated hemispheres of split-brain patients.
    Luck SJ; Hillyard SA; Mangun GR; Gazzaniga MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 23962332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients.
    Luck SJ; Hillyard SA; Mangun GR; Gazzaniga MS
    Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):543-5. PubMed ID: 2586625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unitary attention in callosal agenesis.
    Dell'acqua R; Jolicoeur P; Lassonde M; Angrilli A; De Bastiani P; Pascali A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2005; 22(8):1035-53. PubMed ID: 21038288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring the visual world: hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention.
    Mangun GR; Luck SJ; Plager R; Loftus W; Hillyard SA; Handy T; Clark VP; Gazzaniga MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 23964976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The attentional blink within and across the hemispheres: Evidence from a patient with a complete section of the corpus callosum.
    Ptito A; Brisson B; Dell'Acqua R; Lassonde M; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19539687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
    Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaired visual search in rats reveals cholinergic contributions to feature binding in visuospatial attention.
    Botly LC; De Rosa E
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2441-53. PubMed ID: 22095213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.
    Tanaka G; Mori S; Inadomi H; Hamada Y; Ohta Y; Ozawa H
    Psychiatry Res; 2007 Jan; 149(1-3):25-31. PubMed ID: 17123633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective attention and interhemispheric response competition in the split-brain.
    Lambert A; Naikar N
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):511-46. PubMed ID: 11104540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual letter matching: hemispheric functioning or scanning biases?
    Fecteau JH; Enns JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(10):1412-28. PubMed ID: 15989933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search without attentional displacement.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):9.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search.
    Fenker DB; Heipertz D; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ; Duezel E; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19702468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corollary discharge and spatial updating: when the brain is split, is space still unified?
    Colby CL; Berman RA; Heiser LM; Saunders RC
    Prog Brain Res; 2005; 149():187-205. PubMed ID: 16226585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system.
    Umarova RM; Saur D; Kaller CP; Vry MS; Glauche V; Mader I; Hennig J; Weiller C
    Brain; 2011 Nov; 134(Pt 11):3310-25. PubMed ID: 21948940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the noradrenergic agonist clonidine on temporal and spatial attention.
    Nieuwenhuis S; van Nieuwpoort IC; Veltman DJ; Drent ML
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Aug; 193(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 17431591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.