These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23962461)

  • 1. The problem of controlling for imperfectly measured confounders on dissimilar populations: a database simulation study.
    Schonberger RB; Gilbertsen T; Dai F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Apr; 28(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 23962461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atenolol is associated with lower day-of-surgery heart rate compared to long- and short-acting metoprolol.
    Schonberger RB; Brandt C; Feinleib J; Dai F; Burg MM
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Apr; 27(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 22889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding pitfalls when combining multiple imputation and propensity scores.
    Granger E; Sergeant JC; Lunt M
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(26):5120-5132. PubMed ID: 31512265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.
    Austin PC; Small DS
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4306-19. PubMed ID: 25087884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimizing confounding in comparative observational studies with time-to-event outcomes: An extensive comparison of covariate balancing methods using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Cafri G; Fortin S; Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1437-1460. PubMed ID: 39053570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
    Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Apr; 5(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 20949126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2505-2525. PubMed ID: 26329750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative β-blockade: atenolol is associated with reduced mortality when compared to metoprolol.
    Wallace AW; Au S; Cason BA
    Anesthesiology; 2011 Apr; 114(4):824-36. PubMed ID: 21372680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of balancing scores using the ANCOVA approach for estimating average treatment effect: a simulation study.
    Tu C; Koh WY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):508-515. PubMed ID: 30561245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20108233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative metoprolol and risk of stroke after noncardiac surgery.
    Mashour GA; Sharifpour M; Freundlich RE; Tremper KK; Shanks A; Nallamothu BK; Vlisides PE; Weightman A; Matlen L; Merte J; Kheterpal S
    Anesthesiology; 2013 Dec; 119(6):1340-6. PubMed ID: 23612244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Terminating observation within matched pairs of subjects in a matched cohort analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Sutradhar R; Baxter NN; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 26278725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance evaluation of regression splines for propensity score adjustment in post-market safety analysis with multiple treatments.
    Tian Y; Baro E; Zhang R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):810-821. PubMed ID: 31502924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beta blockers for elective surgery in elderly patients: population based, retrospective cohort study.
    Redelmeier D; Scales D; Kopp A
    BMJ; 2005 Oct; 331(7522):932. PubMed ID: 16210252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.