220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23962590)
1. Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
Smith SM; Wang AT; Pereira A; Chang DR; McKeown A; Greene K; Rowbotham MC; Burke LB; Coplan P; Gilron I; Hertz SH; Katz NP; Lin AH; McDermott MP; Papadopoulos EJ; Rappaport BA; Sweeney M; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2769-2774. PubMed ID: 23962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in clinical trials of opioid use disorder: ACTTION review and recommendations.
Kleykamp BA; Ferguson MC; McNicol E; Bixho I; Matthews M; Turk DC; Dworkin RH; Strain EC
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2022 Jul; 236():109447. PubMed ID: 35580477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RReACT goes global: perils and pitfalls of constructing a global open-access database of registered analgesic clinical trials and trial results.
Munch T; Dufka FL; Greene K; Smith SM; Dworkin RH; Rowbotham MC
Pain; 2014 Jul; 155(7):1313-1317. PubMed ID: 24726925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Li XQ; Yang GL; Tao KM; Zhang HQ; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 24131272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Published intimate partner violence studies often differ from their trial registration records.
Madden K; Tai K; Ali Z; Schneider P; Singh M; Ghert M; Bhandari M
Women Health; 2019 Jan; 59(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 29281583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies between Registered and Published Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials within the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review.
Hudson AS; Morzycki AD; Samargandi OA; Williams JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):245-255. PubMed ID: 31609284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
Pranić S; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Published trials of TACE for HCC are often not registered and subject to outcome reporting bias.
Grégory J; Créquit P; Vilgrain V; Boutron I; Ronot M
JHEP Rep; 2021 Feb; 3(1):100196. PubMed ID: 33490934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results availability for analgesic device, complex regional pain syndrome, and post-stroke pain trials: comparing the RReADS, RReACT, and RReMiT databases.
Dufka FL; Munch T; Dworkin RH; Rowbotham MC
Pain; 2015 Jan; 156(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25599303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.
Jones CW; Keil LG; Holland WC; Caughey MC; Platts-Mills TF
BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():282. PubMed ID: 26581191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.
Ross JS; Mulvey GK; Hines EM; Nissen SE; Krumholz HM
PLoS Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000144. PubMed ID: 19901971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Bourgeois FT; Murthy S; Mandl KD
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Aug; 153(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 20679560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health.
Vrljičak Davidović N; Komić L; Mešin I; Kotarac M; Okmažić D; Franić T
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2022 May; 31(5):757-769. PubMed ID: 33459886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary endpoint discrepancies were found in one in ten clinical drug trials. Results of an inception cohort study.
van den Bogert CA; Souverein PC; Brekelmans CTM; Janssen SWJ; Koëter GH; Leufkens HGM; Bouter LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():199-208. PubMed ID: 28535887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
