BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23962590)

  • 1. Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
    Smith SM; Wang AT; Pereira A; Chang DR; McKeown A; Greene K; Rowbotham MC; Burke LB; Coplan P; Gilron I; Hertz SH; Katz NP; Lin AH; McDermott MP; Papadopoulos EJ; Rappaport BA; Sweeney M; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
    Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2769-2774. PubMed ID: 23962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in clinical trials of opioid use disorder: ACTTION review and recommendations.
    Kleykamp BA; Ferguson MC; McNicol E; Bixho I; Matthews M; Turk DC; Dworkin RH; Strain EC
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2022 Jul; 236():109447. PubMed ID: 35580477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RReACT goes global: perils and pitfalls of constructing a global open-access database of registered analgesic clinical trials and trial results.
    Munch T; Dufka FL; Greene K; Smith SM; Dworkin RH; Rowbotham MC
    Pain; 2014 Jul; 155(7):1313-1317. PubMed ID: 24726925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatology.
    Li XQ; Yang GL; Tao KM; Zhang HQ; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 24131272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
    Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
    Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Published intimate partner violence studies often differ from their trial registration records.
    Madden K; Tai K; Ali Z; Schneider P; Singh M; Ghert M; Bhandari M
    Women Health; 2019 Jan; 59(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 29281583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies between Registered and Published Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials within the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review.
    Hudson AS; Morzycki AD; Samargandi OA; Williams JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):245-255. PubMed ID: 31609284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
    Pranić S; Marušić A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
    Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
    Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Published trials of TACE for HCC are often not registered and subject to outcome reporting bias.
    Grégory J; Créquit P; Vilgrain V; Boutron I; Ronot M
    JHEP Rep; 2021 Feb; 3(1):100196. PubMed ID: 33490934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.
    Jones CW; Keil LG; Holland WC; Caughey MC; Platts-Mills TF
    BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():282. PubMed ID: 26581191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Ross JS; Mulvey GK; Hines EM; Nissen SE; Krumholz HM
    PLoS Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000144. PubMed ID: 19901971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results availability for analgesic device, complex regional pain syndrome, and post-stroke pain trials: comparing the RReADS, RReACT, and RReMiT databases.
    Dufka FL; Munch T; Dworkin RH; Rowbotham MC
    Pain; 2015 Jan; 156(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25599303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Bourgeois FT; Murthy S; Mandl KD
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Aug; 153(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 20679560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health.
    Vrljičak Davidović N; Komić L; Mešin I; Kotarac M; Okmažić D; Franić T
    Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2022 May; 31(5):757-769. PubMed ID: 33459886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
    Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
    Rongen JJ; Hannink G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary endpoint discrepancies were found in one in ten clinical drug trials. Results of an inception cohort study.
    van den Bogert CA; Souverein PC; Brekelmans CTM; Janssen SWJ; Koëter GH; Leufkens HGM; Bouter LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():199-208. PubMed ID: 28535887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.