BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23963012)

  • 1. Surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a consensus statement.
    Lawrence BD; Shamji MF; Traynelis VC; Yoon ST; Rhee JM; Chapman JR; Brodke DS; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S171-2. PubMed ID: 23963012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Kim B; Yoon DH; Shin HC; Kim KN; Yi S; Shin DA; Ha Y
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 25637468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
    Houten JK; Cooper PR
    Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Versus Other Forms of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from the Prospective, Multicenter AOSpine CSM-International Study of 479 Patients.
    Nakashima H; Tetreault L; Nagoshi N; Nouri A; Arnold P; Yukawa Y; Toyone T; Tanaka M; Zhou Q; Fehlings MG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):370-8. PubMed ID: 26935459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members.
    Nouri A; Martin AR; Nater A; Witiw CD; Kato S; Tetreault L; Reihani-Kermani H; Santaguida C; Fehlings MG
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():864-874. PubMed ID: 28625905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term follow-up of cervical radiographic sagittal spinal alignment after 1- and 2-level cervical corpectomy for the treatment of spondylosis of the subaxial cervical spine causing radiculomyelopathy or myelopathy: a retrospective study.
    Andaluz N; Zuccarello M; Kuntz C
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 22035103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.
    Rhee JM; Shamji MF; Erwin WM; Bransford RJ; Yoon ST; Smith JS; Kim HJ; Ely CG; Dettori JR; Patel AA; Kalsi-Ryan S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S55-67. PubMed ID: 23963006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior cervical multilevel decompression and fusion using fibular strut as revision surgery for failed cervical laminoplasty.
    Komura S; Miyamoto K; Hosoe H; Fushimi K; Iwai C; Nishimoto H; Shimizu K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Sep; 131(9):1177-85. PubMed ID: 21191604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty.
    Iwasaki M; Okuda S; Miyauchi A; Sakaura H; Mukai Y; Yonenobu K; Yoshikawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 17413469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Wang X; Chen Y; Chen D; Yuan W; Zhao J; Jia L; Zhao D
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):404-7. PubMed ID: 19652565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laminoplasty outcomes: is there a difference between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?
    Meyer SA; Wu JC; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Mar; 30(3):E9. PubMed ID: 21361755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetics and heritability of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: results of a systematic review.
    Wilson JR; Patel AA; Brodt ED; Dettori JR; Brodke DS; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S123-46. PubMed ID: 23963008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of intraoperative ultrasound in oblique corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Moses V; Daniel RT; Chacko AG
    Br J Neurosurg; 2010 Oct; 24(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 20707681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty.
    Iwasaki M; Okuda S; Miyauchi A; Sakaura H; Mukai Y; Yonenobu K; Yoshikawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 17413470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?
    Fujimori T; Le H; Ziewacz JE; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(1):E9. PubMed ID: 23815254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.
    Yagi M; Ninomiya K; Kihara M; Horiuchi Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 20043766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.
    Lee DG; Lee SH; Park SJ; Kim ES; Chung SS; Lee CS; Eoh W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):E198-203. PubMed ID: 23511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
    Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis, heritability, and outcome assessment in cervical myelopathy: a consensus statement.
    Wilson JR; Fehlings MG; Kalsi-Ryan S; Shamji MF; Tetreault LA; Rhee JM; Chapman JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S76-7. PubMed ID: 23963010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.