134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23963014)
1. Utility of postoperative radiographs after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with or without posterior instrumentation.
Simpson AK; Osler P; Wood KB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2038-42. PubMed ID: 23963014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion.
Fogel GR; Toohey JS; Neidre A; Brantigan JW
Spine J; 2008; 8(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 17544854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of postoperative radiographs for cervical spine fusion: a comprehensive evaluation of operative technique, surgical indication, and duration since surgery.
Shau DN; Bible JE; Samade R; Gadomski SP; Mushtaq B; Wallace A; McGirt MJ; O'Neill KR; Devin CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):1994-2000. PubMed ID: 22565389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are routine radiographs needed in the first year after lumbar spinal fusions?
Romero NC; Glaser J; Walton Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1578-80. PubMed ID: 19521273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of repeated postoperative radiographs after lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine.
Yamashita T; Steinmetz MP; Lieberman IH; Modic MT; Mroz TE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1955-60. PubMed ID: 21304422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.
Le TV; Baaj AA; Dakwar E; Burkett CJ; Murray G; Smith DA; Uribe JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):1268-73. PubMed ID: 22695245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Nemani VM; Aichmair A; Taher F; Lebl DR; Hughes AP; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E326-31. PubMed ID: 24299718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovery room radiographs not found to have incremental utility above intraoperative images after lumbar fusion procedures.
Bohl DD; Gruskay JA; Miller CP; Varthi A; Ruiz FK; Whang PG; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1927-33. PubMed ID: 23883831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
Willems P
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants.
Nguyen HV; Akbarnia BA; van Dam BE; Raiszadeh K; Bagheri R; Canale S; Sylvain GM; Barone R; Bench G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2449-53. PubMed ID: 17023854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do routine radiographs within the first two years following pediatric posterior spinal fusion prompt revision surgery?
Garcia GH; Park MJ; Baldwin K; Flynn J; Spiegel DA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(25):2216-20. PubMed ID: 24048089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion in patients older than 70 years of age: analysis of peri- and postoperative complications.
Karikari IO; Grossi PM; Nimjee SM; Hardin C; Hodges TR; Hughes BD; Brown CR; Isaacs RE
Neurosurgery; 2011 Apr; 68(4):897-902; discussion 902. PubMed ID: 21221024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Cong GT; Tsiouris AJ; James AR; Paulo D; Elowitz E; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):623-35. PubMed ID: 24702513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reamed transacral interbody fusion for L5-s1 pseudoarthrosis: a novel salvage technique in 10 patients.
Lebl DR; Sama AA; Pumberger M; Kotwal S; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):334-41. PubMed ID: 22262027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
