These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23963511)
1. Assessment of binding energies of atmospherically relevant clusters. Elm J; Bilde M; Mikkelsen KV Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Oct; 15(39):16442-5. PubMed ID: 23963511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Density Functional Theory in Predicting Structures and Free Energies of Reaction of Atmospheric Prenucleation Clusters. Elm J; Bilde M; Mikkelsen KV J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Jun; 8(6):2071-7. PubMed ID: 26593839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appropriate description of intermolecular interactions in the methane hydrates: an assessment of DFT methods. Liu Y; Zhao J; Li F; Chen Z J Comput Chem; 2013 Jan; 34(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 22949382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zn Coordination Chemistry: Development of Benchmark Suites for Geometries, Dipole Moments, and Bond Dissociation Energies and Their Use To Test and Validate Density Functionals and Molecular Orbital Theory. Amin EA; Truhlar DG J Chem Theory Comput; 2008 Jan; 4(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 26619981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heats of Formation of Medium-Sized Organic Compounds from Contemporary Electronic Structure Methods. Minenkov Y; Wang H; Wang Z; Sarathy SM; Cavallo L J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Aug; 13(8):3537-3560. PubMed ID: 28636351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Accuracy of Density Functional and Semiempirical Wave Function Methods for Water Nanoparticles: Comparing Binding and Relative Energies of (H2O)16 and (H2O)17 to CCSD(T) Results. Leverentz HR; Qi HW; Truhlar DG J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Feb; 9(2):995-1006. PubMed ID: 26588742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unrestricted prescriptions for open-shell singlet diradicals: using economical ab initio and density functional theory to calculate singlet-triplet gaps and bond dissociation curves. Ess DH; Cook TC J Phys Chem A; 2012 May; 116(20):4922-9. PubMed ID: 22578025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of B3LYP, X3LYP, and M06-Class Density Functionals for Predicting the Binding Energies of Neutral, Protonated, and Deprotonated Water Clusters. Bryantsev VS; Diallo MS; van Duin AC; Goddard WA J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Apr; 5(4):1016-26. PubMed ID: 26609610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: a comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals. Burns LA; Vázquez-Mayagoitia A; Sumpter BG; Sherrill CD J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(8):084107. PubMed ID: 21361527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying the Performances of DFT for Predicting Vibrationally Resolved Optical Spectra: Asymmetric Fluoroborate Dyes as Working Examples. Bednarska J; Zaleśny R; Bartkowiak W; Ośmiałowski B; Medved' M; Jacquemin D J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Sep; 13(9):4347-4356. PubMed ID: 28777575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Assessment of DFT Performances in Ru- and Rh-Promoted σ-Bond Activations. Sun Y; Hu L; Chen H J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Apr; 11(4):1428-38. PubMed ID: 26574354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Density functional theory assessment of molecular structures and energies of neutral and anionic Al(n) (n = 2-10) clusters. Paranthaman S; Hong K; Kim J; Kim DE; Kim TK J Phys Chem A; 2013 Sep; 117(38):9293-303. PubMed ID: 24028335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the accuracy of density functionals for prediction of relative energies and geometries of low-lying isomers of water hexamers. Dahlke EE; Olson RM; Leverentz HR; Truhlar DG J Phys Chem A; 2008 May; 112(17):3976-84. PubMed ID: 18393474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of density functionals for pi systems: Energy differences between cumulenes and poly-ynes; proton affinities, bond length alternation, and torsional potentials of conjugated polyenes; and proton affinities of conjugated Shiff bases. Zhao Y; Truhlar DG J Phys Chem A; 2006 Sep; 110(35):10478-86. PubMed ID: 16942053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of M06, M06-2X, and M06-HF density functionals for conformationally flexible anionic clusters: M06 functionals perform better than B3LYP for a model system with dispersion and ionic hydrogen-bonding interactions. Walker M; Harvey AJ; Sen A; Dessent CE J Phys Chem A; 2013 Nov; 117(47):12590-600. PubMed ID: 24147965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of new meta and hybrid meta density functionals for predicting the geometry and binding energy of a challenging system: the dimer of H2S and benzene. Leverentz HR; Truhlar DG J Phys Chem A; 2008 Jul; 112(26):6009-16. PubMed ID: 18540587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Density Functionals for Activation Energies of Re-Catalyzed Organic Reactions. Sun Y; Chen H J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Feb; 10(2):579-88. PubMed ID: 26580034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Big data benchmarking: how do DFT methods across the rungs of Jacob's ladder perform for a dataset of 122k CCSD(T) total atomization energies? Karton A Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 May; 26(20):14594-14606. PubMed ID: 38738470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of conventional and dispersion-corrected density-functional theory methods for hydrogen bonding interaction energies. DiLabio GA; Johnson ER; Otero-de-la-Roza A Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 15(31):12821-8. PubMed ID: 23803877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benchmarking DFT Functionals for Excited-State Calculations of Donor-Acceptor TADF Emitters: Insights on the Key Parameters Determining Reverse Inter-System Crossing. Hall D; Sancho-García JC; Pershin A; Beljonne D; Zysman-Colman E; Olivier Y J Phys Chem A; 2023 Jun; 127(21):4743-4757. PubMed ID: 37196185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]