These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23963529)

  • 61. Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys.
    Maguire DR; Gerak LR; France CP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Sep; 229(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 23636304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Dopaminergic and glutamatergic regulation of effort- and delay-based decision making.
    Floresco SB; Tse MT; Ghods-Sharifi S
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Jul; 33(8):1966-79. PubMed ID: 17805307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Neuronal development genes are key elements mediating the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine, amphetamine, and methylphenidate.
    Dela Peña I; Jeon SJ; Lee E; Ryu JH; Shin CY; Noh M; Cheong JH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Dec; 230(3):399-413. PubMed ID: 23783774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Ethanol pre-exposure does not increase delay discounting in P rats, but does impair the ability to dynamically adapt behavioral allocation to changing reinforcer contingencies.
    Beckwith SW; Czachowski CL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2019 Dec; 187():172816. PubMed ID: 31654652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Delay discounting of qualitatively different reinforcers in rats.
    Calvert AL; Green L; Myerson J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 20885809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The effects of chronic cocaine exposure on impulsivity in rats.
    Dandy KL; Gatch MB
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):400-5. PubMed ID: 19675455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effects of environmental enrichment on extinction and reinstatement of amphetamine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding.
    Stairs DJ; Klein ED; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 17(7):597-604. PubMed ID: 17021392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19794834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Differential effects of d-amphetamine on impulsive choice in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats.
    Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):549-53. PubMed ID: 19654504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Role of ionotropic glutamate receptors in delay and probability discounting in the rat.
    Yates JR; Batten SR; Bardo MT; Beckmann JS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Apr; 232(7):1187-96. PubMed ID: 25270726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists impair discriminability of reinforcer magnitude, but not risky choice, in a probability-discounting task.
    Yates JR; Chitwood MR; Evans KE; Kappesser JL; Murray CP; Paradella-Bradley TA; Torline BT
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jun; 365():77-81. PubMed ID: 30831139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of acute and repeated nicotine administration on delay discounting in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.
    Anderson KG; Diller JW
    Behav Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 21(8):754-64. PubMed ID: 20944502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration.
    Slawecki CJ; Samson HH; Chappell A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Dec; 58(4):1065-73. PubMed ID: 9408215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Differential effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on risk-based decision making of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.
    Ozga-Hess JE; Anderson KG
    Behav Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 30(7):605-616. PubMed ID: 31503070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Dynamic changes in sensitivity occur during the acute response to cocaine and methylphenidate.
    Kuczenski R; Segal DS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Nov; 147(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10591874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Dopaminergic and opiate agonists and antagonists differentially decrease multiple schedule responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose.
    Slawecki CJ; Hodge CW; Samson HH
    Alcohol; 1997; 14(3):281-94. PubMed ID: 9160806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Social play behavior, ultrasonic vocalizations and their modulation by morphine and amphetamine in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Manduca A; Campolongo P; Palmery M; Vanderschuren LJ; Cuomo V; Trezza V
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2014 Apr; 231(8):1661-73. PubMed ID: 24221828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Adolescent methylmercury exposure affects choice and delay discounting in mice.
    Boomhower SR; Newland MC
    Neurotoxicology; 2016 Dec; 57():136-144. PubMed ID: 27677934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Self-administration of central stimulants by rats: a comparison of the effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate and McNeil 4612.
    Nielsen JA; Duda NJ; Mokler DJ; Moore KE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Feb; 20(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 6144109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.