These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23963748)

  • 1. Transmission of acoustic emission in bones, implants and dental materials.
    Ossi Z; Abdou W; Reuben RL; Ibbetson RJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Nov; 227(11):1237-45. PubMed ID: 23963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro assessment of bone-implant interface using an acoustic emission transmission test.
    Ossi Z; Abdou W; Reuben RL; Ibbetson RJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Jan; 226(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22888586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ex vivo mechanical properties of dental implant bone cement used to rescue initially unstable dental implants: a rabbit study.
    Seong WJ; Kim HC; Jeong S; DeVeau DL; Aparicio C; Li Y; Hodges JS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):826-36. PubMed ID: 21841993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.
    Lachmann S; Laval JY; Axmann D; Weber H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 21483888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
    Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
    Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Displacement of dental implants in trabecular bone under a static lateral load in fresh bovine bone.
    Engelke W; Müller A; Decco OA; Rau MJ; Cura AC; Ruscio ML; Knösel M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 21682842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography.
    Morinaga K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18384402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces.
    Elias JJ; Brunski JB; Scarton HA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 8990633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrastructure of the bone-cement and the bone-metal interface.
    Linder L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):147-56. PubMed ID: 1537145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants.
    Elias CN; Rocha FA; Nascimento AL; Coelho PG
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():169-80. PubMed ID: 23182386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attenuation of acoustic emission body waves in acrylic bone cement and synthetic bone using wavelet time-scale analysis.
    Qi G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Oct; 52(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 10906686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
    Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the influence of bone density and thickness on resonance frequency analysis: an in vitro study of biomechanical test materials.
    Bardyn T; Gédet P; Hallermann W; Büchler P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1006-14. PubMed ID: 20162104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
    Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What physical and/or biochemical characteristics of roughened endosseous implant surfaces particularly enhance their bone-implant contact capability?
    Cooper LF; Deporter D; Wennerberg A; Hämmerle C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 15839126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro acoustic waves propagation in human and bovine cancellous bone.
    Cardoso L; Teboul F; Sedel L; Oddou C; Meunier A
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Oct; 18(10):1803-12. PubMed ID: 14584891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temperature changes at the implant-bone interface during simulated surface decontamination with an Er:YAG laser.
    Kreisler M; Al Haj H; d'Hoedt B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 12475166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface.
    Davies JE
    Anat Rec; 1996 Jun; 245(2):426-45. PubMed ID: 8769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.