153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23963970)
1. Perpetuating one's own disadvantage: intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality.
Sengupta NK; Sibley CG
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1391-403. PubMed ID: 23963970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ingroup friendship and political mobilization among the disadvantaged.
Sengupta NK; Milojev P; Barlow FK; Sibley CG
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Jul; 21(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 25313430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond contact: intergroup contact in the context of power relations.
Saguy T; Dovidio JF; Pratto F
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Mar; 34(3):432-45. PubMed ID: 18272809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Friend or ally: whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don't say).
Becker JC; Wright SC; Lubensky ME; Zhou S
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):442-55. PubMed ID: 23504760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies.
Wakslak CJ; Jost JT; Tyler TR; Chen ES
Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 17444925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What fosters concern for inequality among American adolescents?
Cech EA
Soc Sci Res; 2017 Jan; 61():160-180. PubMed ID: 27886726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceiving social inequity: when subordinate-group positioning on one dimension of social hierarchy enhances privilege recognition on another.
Rosette AS; Tost LP
Psychol Sci; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1420-7. PubMed ID: 23740549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of the "ironic" effects of intergroup contact.
Reimer NK; Sengupta NK
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Feb; 124(2):362-380. PubMed ID: 35849365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is contact among social class groups associated with legitimation of inequality? An examination across 28 countries.
Vargas Salfate S; Stern C
Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Apr; 63(2):572-590. PubMed ID: 38009906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members.
Kteily NS; Rocklage MD; McClanahan K; Ho AK
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jan; 116(5):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 30642960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The irony of harmony: intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality.
Saguy T; Tausch N; Dovidio JF; Pratto F
Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 19152543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advantaged group's emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: the dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy.
Harth NS; Kessler T; Leach CW
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jan; 34(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 18162660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The status-legitimacy hypothesis revisited: Ethnic-group differences in general and dimension-specific legitimacy.
Sengupta NK; Osborne D; Sibley CG
Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Jun; 54(2):324-40. PubMed ID: 25156504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.
Hässler T; Ullrich J; Bernardino M; Shnabel N; Laar CV; Valdenegro D; Sebben S; Tropp LR; Visintin EP; González R; Ditlmann RK; Abrams D; Selvanathan HP; Branković M; Wright S; von Zimmermann J; Pasek M; Aydin AL; Žeželj I; Pereira A; Lantos NA; Sainz M; Glenz A; Oberpfalzerová H; Bilewicz M; Kende A; Kuzawinska O; Otten S; Maloku E; Noor M; Gul P; Pistella J; Baiocco R; Jelic M; Osin E; Bareket O; Biruski DC; Cook JE; Dawood M; Droogendyk L; Loyo AH; Kelmendi K; Ugarte LM
Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):380-386. PubMed ID: 31988440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Need satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multinational study of pathways toward social change.
Hässler T; Ullrich J; Sebben S; Shnabel N; Bernardino M; Valdenegro D; Van Laar C; González R; Visintin EP; Tropp LR; Ditlmann RK; Abrams D; Aydin AL; Pereira A; Selvanathan HP; von Zimmermann J; Lantos NA; Sainz M; Glenz A; Kende A; Oberpfalzerová H; Bilewicz M; Branković M; Noor M; Pasek MH; Wright SC; Žeželj I; Kuzawinska O; Maloku E; Otten S; Gul P; Bareket O; Corkalo Biruski D; Mugnol-Ugarte L; Osin E; Baiocco R; Cook JE; Dawood M; Droogendyk L; Loyo AH; Jelić M; Kelmendi K; Pistella J
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Apr; 122(4):634-658. PubMed ID: 34138605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Helpful only in the abstract?
Vorauer JD; Sasaki SJ
Psychol Sci; 2009 Feb; 20(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 19170943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Group differences in the legitimization of inequality: Questioning the role of social dominance orientation.
Pehrson S; Carvacho H; Sibley CG
Br J Soc Psychol; 2017 Mar; 56(1):28-46. PubMed ID: 27762440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Through rose-colored glasses: system-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization.
Osborne D; Sibley CG
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Aug; 39(8):991-1004. PubMed ID: 23719621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social inequality and ethnic differences in smoking in New Zealand.
Barnett R; Moon G; Kearns R
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jul; 59(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15087149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Community inequality and smoking cessation in New Zealand, 1981-2006.
Barnett R; Pearce J; Moon G
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Mar; 68(5):876-84. PubMed ID: 19136183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
