These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23964412)

  • 1. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interruption management: the use of attention-directing tactile cues.
    Hopp PJ; Smith CA; Clegg BA; Heggestad ED
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15960083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactile, Visual, and Crossmodal Visual-Tactile Change Blindness: The Effect of Transient Type and Task Demands.
    Riggs SL; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 30566845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What You Don't Notice Can Harm You: Age-Related Differences in Detecting Concurrent Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Cues.
    Pitts BJ; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):445-464. PubMed ID: 29470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An eye movement analysis of the effect of interruption modality on primary task resumption.
    Ratwani R; Trafton JG
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 21077561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.
    Arrabito GR; Ho G; Aghaei B; Burns C; Hou M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1403-16. PubMed ID: 26276365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal distraction by deviance: functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):355-63. PubMed ID: 22750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments.
    Ferris TK; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferential processing of tactile events under conditions of divided attention.
    Hanson JV; Whitaker D; Heron J
    Neuroreport; 2009 Oct; 20(15):1392-6. PubMed ID: 19738497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When to use vibrotactile displays? A meta-analysis for the role of vibrotactile displays in human-computer interaction.
    Chai C; Shi J; Wu C; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Liao J
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Sep; 103():103802. PubMed ID: 35623202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Not Now! Supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks.
    Ho CY; Nikolic MI; Waters MJ; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 15573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task and interruption management.
    Hameed S; Ferris T; Jayaraman S; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 19653478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Development and Evaluation of Countermeasures to Tactile Change Blindness.
    Riggs SL; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 26826063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search.
    Wahn B; Schwandt J; Krüger M; Crafa D; Nunnendorf V; König P
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):781-95. PubMed ID: 26587687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory, tactile, and audiotactile information processing following visual deprivation.
    Occelli V; Spence C; Zampini M
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 139(1):189-212. PubMed ID: 22612281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Employing an active mental task to enhance the performance of auditory attention-based brain-computer interfaces.
    Xu H; Zhang D; Ouyang M; Hong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22854211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.