These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23964414)

  • 1. Stopping decisions: information order effects on nonfocal evaluations.
    Yu M; Gonzalez C
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):732-46. PubMed ID: 23964414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual biases during cued task switching relate to decision process differences between children and adults.
    Martinez JE; Mack ML; Bauer JR; Roe MA; Church JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1603-1618. PubMed ID: 30024226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.
    Shepherdson P; Oberauer K; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):286-310. PubMed ID: 28557495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Specific and nonspecific neural activity during selective processing of visual representations in working memory.
    Oh H; Leung HC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 22(2):292-306. PubMed ID: 19400681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1040-50. PubMed ID: 19744942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2068-79. PubMed ID: 19225989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A facilitative effect of negative affective valence on working memory.
    Gotoh F; Kikuchi T; Olofsson U
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 20132459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):222-50. PubMed ID: 22060144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 19210085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional cueing reverses deficits in spatial working memory task performance in chronic low dose MPTP-treated monkeys.
    Decamp E; Tinker JP; Schneider JS
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 152(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 15196793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating the components of switch cost using two-to-two cue-task mapping.
    Hydock C; Sohn MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 21463080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Toffanin P; Luria R; Jolicoeur P
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.
    Higgs S; Rutters F; Thomas JM; Naish K; Humphreys GW
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modification of response time variability in a decision-making task.
    Stoet G; Ruge H; Snyder LH
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1321-4. PubMed ID: 18695516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the effect of verbal working memory load on visuo-spatial exogenous orienting.
    Santangelo V; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 413(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17174028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.