These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23964599)

  • 1. Individual Differences in Inference Generation: An ERP Analysis.
    George MS; Mannes S; Hoffman JE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1997 Nov; 9(6):776-87. PubMed ID: 23964599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading.
    Calvo MG
    Memory; 2001 Jul; 9(4):365-381. PubMed ID: 11747589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory and inferences: evidence from eye fixations during reading.
    Calvo MG
    Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):365-81. PubMed ID: 11594358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory capacity and individual differences in the making of reinstatement and elaborative inferences.
    Barreyro JP; Cevasco J; Burín D; Molinari Marotto C
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Jul; 15(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 22774420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory capacity and time course of predictive inferences.
    Estevez A; Calvo MG
    Memory; 2000 Jan; 8(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 10820587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.
    Waters GS; Caplan D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):51-75. PubMed ID: 8920099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferences during story comprehension: cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working memory capacity.
    Virtue S; Parrish T; Jung-Beeman M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2274-84. PubMed ID: 18457505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric processing of inferences: the effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity.
    Virtue S; van den Broek P; Linderholm T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1341-54. PubMed ID: 17225513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension.
    George MS; Mannes S; Hoffinan JE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 23962331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word-Decoding Skill Interacts With Working Memory Capacity to Influence Inference Generation During Reading.
    Hamilton S; Freed E; Long DL
    Read Res Q; 2016; 51(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 27833213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach.
    Bornkessel ID; Fiebach CJ; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15325409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing.
    Singer M; Ritchot KF
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8961818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing children's inference generation: what do tests of reading comprehension measure?
    Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Jun; 75(Pt 2):189-201. PubMed ID: 16033662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential correlates of individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Nittono H; Nageishi Y; Nakajima Y; Ullsperger P
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Nov; 36(6):745-54. PubMed ID: 10554588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers.
    Kelly LP
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2003; 8(3):230-49. PubMed ID: 15448051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural indicators of inference processes in text comprehension: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Friese U; Rutschmann R; Raabe M; Schmalhofer F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2110-24. PubMed ID: 18416672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension.
    Pérez AI; Paolieri D; Macizo P; Bajo T
    Cogn Process; 2014 Aug; 15(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 24668068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inference vs control sentences: are readers able to detect our intended differences?
    Shears C; Weiss E
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 15708216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.