These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23965199)
1. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-directed therapy. Davies SJ; Minhas S; Wilson RJ; Yates D; Howell SJ J Clin Anesth; 2013 Sep; 25(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 23965199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ). Nordström J; Hällsjö-Sander C; Shore R; Björne H Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 23171725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography. Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Roullet S; Quinart A; Revel P; Sztark F Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 19608819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Myre K; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Jul; 56(6):777-86. PubMed ID: 22288953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pleth variability index predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults during general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery. Siswojo AS; Wong DM; Phan TD; Kluger R J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1505-9. PubMed ID: 25169895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements. Meng L; Tran NP; Alexander BS; Laning K; Chen G; Kain ZN; Cannesson M Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):751-7. PubMed ID: 21821516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients]. Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Derichard A; Robin E; Tavernier B; Costecalde M; Fleyfel M; Onimus J; Lebuffe G; Chambon JP; Vallet B Br J Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 103(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 19797246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study. Bubenek-Turconi ŞI; Hendy A; Băilă S; Drăgan A; Chioncel O; Văleanu L; Moroșanu B; Iliescu VA J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Jun; 34(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 31278544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: agreement of oesophageal Doppler, LiDCOrapid™ and Vigileo FloTrac™ monitors in non-cardiac surgery. Phan TD; Kluger R; Wan C Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 May; 44(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 27246939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device. Biais M; Vidil L; Sarrabay P; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F Crit Care; 2009; 13(6):R195. PubMed ID: 19968880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness in liver cirrhosis patients using dynamic preload variables: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. Wu CY; Cheng YJ; Liu YJ; Wu TT; Chien CT; Chan KC; Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 27167058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgery. Hood JA; Wilson RJ Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 21965349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disagreement between fourth generation FloTrac and LiDCOrapid measurements of cardiac output and stroke volume variation during laparoscopic colectomy. Nakasuji M; Okutani A; Miyata T; Imanaka N; Tanaka M; Nakasuji K; Nagai M J Clin Anesth; 2016 Dec; 35():150-156. PubMed ID: 27871513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]