These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23965199)

  • 21. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Cannesson M; Musard H; Desebbe O; Boucau C; Simon R; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions.
    Reuter DA; Goepfert MS; Goresch T; Schmoeckel M; Kilger E; Goetz AE
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15591333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study.
    Lan H; Zhou X; Xue J; Liu B; Chen G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):165. PubMed ID: 29202703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy.
    Guinot PG; de Broca B; Bernard E; Abou Arab O; Lorne E; Dupont H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 112(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 24366723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
    Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
    Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The ability of PiCCO versus LiDCO variables to detect changes in cardiac index: a prospective clinical study.
    Donati A; Nardella R; Gabbanelli V; Scarcella M; Romanelli M; Romagnoli L; Botticelli L; Pantanetti S; Pelaia P
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2008; 74(7-8):367-74. PubMed ID: 18414371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with thoracic kyphosis.
    Chen Y; Guo X; Fu J; Dong T; Liu X; Lv H
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7571-7578. PubMed ID: 34154341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of esophageal Doppler and plethysmographic variability index to guide intraoperative fluid therapy for low-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
    Warnakulasuriya SR; Davies SJ; Wilson RJ; Yates DR
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():600-8. PubMed ID: 27687456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. FloTrac/Vigileo(TM) (third generation) and MostCare(®)/PRAM versus echocardiography for cardiac output estimation in vascular surgery.
    Romagnoli S; Ricci Z; Romano SM; Dimizio F; Bonicolini E; Quattrone D; De Gaudio R
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1114-21. PubMed ID: 24055563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study.
    Machare-Delgado E; Decaro M; Marik PE
    J Intensive Care Med; 2011; 26(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 21595098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
    Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
    J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The plethysmographic variability index does not predict fluid responsiveness estimated by esophageal Doppler during kidney transplantation: A controlled study.
    Le Guen M; Follin A; Gayat E; Fischler M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(20):e10723. PubMed ID: 29768341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.
    Sawa T; Kinoshita M; Kainuma A; Akiyama K; Naito Y; Kato H; Amaya F; Shigemi K
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Oct; 31(5):927-941. PubMed ID: 27492429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
    Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
    Suehiro K; Okutani R
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2010 Oct; 24(5):772-5. PubMed ID: 20638869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine.
    Monnet X; Guérin L; Jozwiak M; Bataille A; Julien F; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 110(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 23103777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
    Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
    Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.