These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23965452)

  • 1. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars.
    Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
    Wankhade AD; Kumar R; Singh RK; Chandra A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(2):E38-42. PubMed ID: 23635968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
    Liang YH; Jiang L; Chen C; Gao XJ; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX.
    Orosco FA; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB; Bramante CM; Duarte MA; Moraes IG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 23138737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.
    Kishor KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 23151708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2005 Sep; 23(3):124-5. PubMed ID: 16224130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kara Tuncer A; Gerek M
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 24331988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Direct comparison of working length determination by ProPex electronic apex locator and radiographic method--an in vitro study].
    Krajczár K; Soltész MZ; Gyulai G; Marada G; Szabó G; Tóth V
    Fogorv Sz; 2008 Jun; 101(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 18756846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study.
    Mancini M; Felici R; Conte G; Costantini M; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 21496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apical transportation: two assessment methods.
    López FU; Travessas JA; Fachin E; Fontanella V; Grecca F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 19703081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth.
    Mello-Moura AC; Moura-Netto C; Araki AT; Guedes-Pinto AC; Mendes FM
    Int Endod J; 2010 Feb; 43(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 20078703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.