93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23966235)
1. Protein structure modeling for CASP10 by multiple layers of global optimization.
Joo K; Lee J; Sim S; Lee SY; Lee K; Heo S; Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J
Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2():188-95. PubMed ID: 23966235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function.
Lee JW; Won JH; Jeon S; Choo Y; Yeon Y; Oh JS; Kim M; Kim S; Joung I; Jang C; Lee SJ; Kim TH; Jin KH; Song G; Kim ES; Yoo J; Paek E; Noh YK; Joo K
Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 39(12):. PubMed ID: 37995286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sigma-RF: prediction of the variability of spatial restraints in template-based modeling by random forest.
Lee J; Lee K; Joung I; Joo K; Brooks BR; Lee J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():94. PubMed ID: 25886990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Algorithms for multiple protein structure alignment and structure-derived multiple sequence alignment.
Shatsky M; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 413():125-46. PubMed ID: 18075164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling.
Cheng J
BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Mar; 8():18. PubMed ID: 18366648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hybrid global optimization algorithms for protein structure prediction: alternating hybrids.
Klepeis JL; Pieja MJ; Floudas CA
Biophys J; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Pt 1):869-82. PubMed ID: 12547770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenging the state of the art in protein structure prediction: Highlights of experimental target structures for the 10th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Experiment CASP10.
Kryshtafovych A; Moult J; Bales P; Bazan JF; Biasini M; Burgin A; Chen C; Cochran FV; Craig TK; Das R; Fass D; Garcia-Doval C; Herzberg O; Lorimer D; Luecke H; Ma X; Nelson DC; van Raaij MJ; Rohwer F; Segall A; Seguritan V; Zeth K; Schwede T
Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):26-42. PubMed ID: 24318984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated protein motif generation in the structure-based protein function prediction tool ProMOL.
Osipovitch M; Lambrecht M; Baker C; Madha S; Mills JL; Craig PA; Bernstein HJ
J Struct Funct Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16(3-4):101-11. PubMed ID: 26573864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.
Wuyun Q; Chen Y; Shen Y; Cao Y; Hu G; Cui W; Gao J; Zheng W
Molecules; 2024 Feb; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 38398585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modularity of Protein Folds as a Tool for Template-Free Modeling of Structures.
Vallat B; Madrid-Aliste C; Fiser A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004419. PubMed ID: 26252221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving homology modeling from low-sequence identity templates in Rosetta: A case study in GPCRs.
Bender BJ; Marlow B; Meiler J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1007597. PubMed ID: 33112852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the assessment: evaluation of the model quality estimates in CASP10.
Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Fidelis K; Monastyrskyy B; Schwede T; Tramontano A
Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):112-26. PubMed ID: 23780644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward the solution of the protein structure prediction problem.
Pearce R; Zhang Y
J Biol Chem; 2021 Jul; 297(1):100870. PubMed ID: 34119522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting protein tertiary structure and its uncertainty analysis via particle swarm sampling.
Álvarez Ó; Fernández-Martínez JL; Corbeanu AC; Fernández-Muñiz Z; Kloczkowski A
J Mol Model; 2019 Feb; 25(3):79. PubMed ID: 30810816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep template-based protein structure prediction.
Wu F; Xu J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 May; 17(5):e1008954. PubMed ID: 33939695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physics-based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging.
Mirjalili V; Noyes K; Feig M
Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):196-207. PubMed ID: 23737254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.
Moult J; Fidelis K; Kryshtafovych A; Schwede T; Tramontano A
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29082672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of AI-based modeling on the accuracy of protein assembly prediction: Insights from CASP15.
Ozden B; Kryshtafovych A; Karaca E
Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1636-1657. PubMed ID: 37861057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making Use of Averaging Methods in MODELLER for Protein Structure Prediction.
Rosignoli S; Lustrino E; Di Silverio I; Paiardini A
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Jan; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38339009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. OPUS-Rota4: a gradient-based protein side-chain modeling framework assisted by deep learning-based predictors.
Xu G; Wang Q; Ma J
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 34905769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
