These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23966497)

  • 1. Correlation between Clostridium difficile bacterial load, commercial real-time PCR cycle thresholds, and results of diagnostic tests based on enzyme immunoassay and cell culture cytotoxicity assay.
    Dionne LL; Raymond F; Corbeil J; Longtin J; Gervais P; Longtin Y
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 51(11):3624-30. PubMed ID: 23966497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of fecal Clostridium difficile load in discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR: is quantitation the next step in C. difficile testing?
    Leslie JL; Cohen SH; Solnick JV; Polage CR
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Dec; 31(12):3295-9. PubMed ID: 22814877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
    Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium.
    Olling A; Leidinger H; Hoffmann R
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Oct; 35(10):1655-9. PubMed ID: 27323765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
    Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clostridium difficile infection diagnostics - evaluation of the C. DIFF Quik Chek Complete assay, a rapid enzyme immunoassay for detection of toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool samples.
    Johansson K; Karlsson H; Norén T
    APMIS; 2016 Nov; 124(11):1016-1020. PubMed ID: 27651167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.
    Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay.
    Ohshima T; Osaki T; Yamamoto Y; Asai S; Miyachi H; Kamiya S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 30232129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for Clostridium difficile infection.
    Swindells J; Brenwald N; Reading N; Oppenheim B
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 48(2):606-8. PubMed ID: 20032256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superiority of the DNA amplification assay for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection: a clinical comparison of fecal tests.
    Barkin JA; Nandi N; Miller N; Grace A; Barkin JS; Sussman DA
    Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Oct; 57(10):2592-9. PubMed ID: 22576711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Clostridium difficile Epi assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection and typing of the NAP1 strain at a cancer hospital.
    Babady NE; Stiles J; Ruggiero P; Khosa P; Huang D; Shuptar S; Kamboj M; Kiehn TE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 48(12):4519-24. PubMed ID: 20943860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid stool-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time PCR in a children's hospital.
    Luna RA; Boyanton BL; Mehta S; Courtney EM; Webb CR; Revell PA; Versalovic J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 49(3):851-7. PubMed ID: 21209161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Significance of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Growth in Stool Cultures during the Era of Nonculture Methods for the Diagnosis of C. difficile Infection.
    Lee CC; Lee JC; Chiu CW; Tsai PJ; Ko WC; Hung YP
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0079921. PubMed ID: 34668727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of a modified two-step algorithm using a combined glutamate dehydrogenase/toxin enzyme immunoassay and real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Vasoo S; Stevens J; Portillo L; Barza R; Schejbal D; Wu MM; Chancey C; Singh K
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2014 Feb; 47(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 22921803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Bruins MJ; Verbeek E; Wallinga JA; Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LE; Kuijper EJ; Bloembergen P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Nov; 31(11):3035-9. PubMed ID: 22706512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
    Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
    Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan.
    Chang FC; Liu CP; Sun FJ; Lin CC
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2021 Apr; 54(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 31624018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative fecal lactoferrin in toxin-positive and toxin-negative Clostridium difficile specimens.
    LaSala PR; Ekhmimi T; Hill AK; Farooqi I; Perrotta PL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 51(1):311-3. PubMed ID: 23135940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.