262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23967949)
1. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
Jackson HM; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.
Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1747. PubMed ID: 27106322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.
Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2127-37. PubMed ID: 20968383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1225. PubMed ID: 25190396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
