These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23967949)

  • 41. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of spatial configuration and fundamental frequency on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions in the ipsilateral horizontal plane and median planea).
    Yao D; Zhao J; Wang L; Shang Z; Gu J; Wang Y; Jia M; Li J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):2934-2947. PubMed ID: 38717201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2272-82. PubMed ID: 19062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perception of prosody in normal and whispered French.
    Heeren WF; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2026-40. PubMed ID: 25235001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The influence of amplitude envelope information on resolving lexically ambiguous spoken words.
    Szostak CM; Pitt MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):EL249-55. PubMed ID: 25324106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility.
    Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of first formant information in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
    Verschuur C; Boland C; Frost E; Constable J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4279-89. PubMed ID: 23742378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of differences in fundamental frequency on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3667-77. PubMed ID: 21218899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech.
    Binns C; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1765. PubMed ID: 17927436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2726-36. PubMed ID: 25373972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.