These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23967950)

  • 1. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F; Yoho SE; Youngdahl CL; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
    Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dynamic range of useful temporal fine structure cues for speech in the presence of a competing talker.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2162-72. PubMed ID: 21973370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4044-52. PubMed ID: 22225058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A glimpsing account of the role of temporal fine structure information in speech recognition.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():119-26. PubMed ID: 23716216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A correlational method to concurrently measure envelope and temporal fine structure weights: effects of age, cochlear pathology, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1679-89. PubMed ID: 22978896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1747. PubMed ID: 27106322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E; Brand T; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.