These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. If and or: Real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability. Byrne RMJ; Johnson-Laird PN J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):760-780. PubMed ID: 31647286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reasoning about intentions: counterexamples to reasons for actions. Juhos C; Quelhas AC; Byrne RM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):55-76. PubMed ID: 25019601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The negations of conjunctions, conditionals, and disjunctions. Khemlani S; Orenes I; Johnson-Laird PN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():1-7. PubMed ID: 24904998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concessive and semifactual interpretations during reasoning with multiple conditionals. Ruiz-Ballesteros JA; Moreno-Ríos S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 27032289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Analytic Truth and Falsity of Disjunctions. Quelhas AC; Rasga C; Johnson-Laird PN Cogn Sci; 2019 Sep; 43(9):e12739. PubMed ID: 31529532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Possibilities as the foundation of reasoning. Johnson-Laird PN; Ragni M Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():103950. PubMed ID: 31374514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The semantics of 'unless' conditionals: evidence from 'unless' and disjunctive inferences. García-Madruga JA; Carriedo N; Moreno-Ríos S Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):569-79. PubMed ID: 22059303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the inclusive disjunction really mean the conjunction of possibilities? Wang M; Zheng L Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104551. PubMed ID: 33360077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories. Oberauer K Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the generation and evaluation of inferences from single premises. Ormerod TC; Richardson J Mem Cognit; 2003 Apr; 31(3):467-78. PubMed ID: 12795488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The probability of causal conditionals. Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. People think about what is true for conditionals, not what is false: only true possibilities prime the comprehension of "if". Espino O; Santamaria C; Byrne RM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1072-8. PubMed ID: 19165652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors. Cruz N; Baratgin J; Oaksford M; Over DE Front Psychol; 2015; 6():192. PubMed ID: 25762965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two meanings of "if"? Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals. Oberauer K; Geiger SM; Fischer K; Weidenfeld A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):790-819. PubMed ID: 17514595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals. Byrne RM; Tasso A Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):726-40. PubMed ID: 10479830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts. Geiger SM; Oberauer K Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2060-74. PubMed ID: 18265621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]