217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23970258)
1. [The information about mammography screening is not neutral].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Aug; 133(15):1557-8. PubMed ID: 23970258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Summaries for patients: Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer with mammography screening.
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 156(7):I58. PubMed ID: 22473444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Organised mammographic screening--more benefits than harms.
Hofvind S
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Mar; 133(6):619-20. PubMed ID: 23552154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Invitation or summons? UK debate surrounds messages about mammography.
Savage L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jul; 101(13):912-3. PubMed ID: 19549956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Counterpoint).
Berg AO
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1511-2; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Information about mammography screening].
Hofvind S; Ursin G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Oct; 133(19):2024-5. PubMed ID: 24129519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent?
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1508-11. PubMed ID: 14559870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Countering the counterpoint).
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammography screening--time to move focus].
Hoff SR
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Oct; 133(19):2025. PubMed ID: 24129520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.
Kalager M; Adami HO; Bretthauer M; Tamimi RM
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 156(7):491-9. PubMed ID: 22473436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [P-H. Zahl replies].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Oct; 133(19):2025-6. PubMed ID: 24129521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The mammography dilemma.
Berg AO; Allan J; Woolf S
Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):770-1; author reply 771. PubMed ID: 12729441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How much is too much breast screening?
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2015 Jan; 350():h139. PubMed ID: 25588758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A doctor talks about screening mammography.
Robb-Nicholson C
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 Feb; 17(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 20429119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nationwide population-based Nordic screening mammography registers: the only key to final evaluation?
Ljung R; Klint A; Holm LE
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):247. PubMed ID: 21498358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mammography in 40-year-old patients: towards a definitive clarification].
Di Maggio C; Giuseppetti GM; Gozzi G; Majorana M; Vella A; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 8041922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing mammography's benefits and harms.
Schmidt C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju103. PubMed ID: 24685934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nationwide mammography screening registers: the best way to go for mortality evaluation - but there is no free lunch.
Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):235. PubMed ID: 21498355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
