148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23970319)
1. Factors influencing breast density in Japanese women aged 40-49 in breast cancer screening mammography.
Kawahara M; Sato S; Ida Y; Watanabe M; Fujishima M; Ishii H; Hori K; Kanazawa S
Acta Med Okayama; 2013; 67(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 23970319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic Breast Density of Japanese Women Living in Australia: Implications for Breast Screening Policy.
Mizukoshi MM; Hossain SZ; Poulos A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 20(9):2811-2817. PubMed ID: 31554381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Overweight women may require more frequent mammograms.
Printz C
Cancer; 2018 Mar; 124(6):1099. PubMed ID: 29509326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Associated with False Positive Results on Screening Mammography in a Population of Predominantly Hispanic Women.
McGuinness JE; Ueng W; Trivedi MS; Yi HS; David R; Vanegas A; Vargas J; Sandoval R; Kukafka R; Crew KD
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Apr; 27(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 29382701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening Mammography for Average-Risk Women: The Controversy and NCCN's Position.
Helvie MA; Bevers TB
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 30442738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence to Support Screening Women in Their 40s.
Ray KM; Price ER; Joe BN
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):429-439. PubMed ID: 28411671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
Timmermans L; Bleyen L; Bacher K; Van Herck K; Lemmens K; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Martens P; De Brabander I; Goossens M; Thierens H
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3810-3819. PubMed ID: 28289944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening.
Abdolell M; Payne JI; Caines J; Tsuruda K; Barnes PJ; Talbot PJ; Tong O; Brown P; Rivers-Bowerman M; Iles S
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5417-5426. PubMed ID: 32358648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of mammography in women with large breasts.
Gayde C; Goolam I; Bangash HK; Tresham J; Fritschi L; Wylie E
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 22289153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.
Aujero MP; Gavenonis SC; Benjamin R; Zhang Z; Holt JS
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 28221096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography alone for Japanese women.
Ban K; Tsunoda H; Togashi S; Kawaguchi Y; Sato T; Takahashi Y; Nagatsuka Y
Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):459-464. PubMed ID: 33165757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New mammography screening performance metrics based on the entire screening episode.
Sprague BL; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Perry H; Tosteson AAN; Kerlikowske K
Cancer; 2020 Jul; 126(14):3289-3296. PubMed ID: 32374471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To screen or not to screen women in their 40s for breast cancer: is personalized risk-based screening the answer?
Mandelblatt JS; Stout N; Trentham-Dietz A
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 21727294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
