These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23970740)

  • 1. Implementing GRADE: calculating the risk difference from the baseline risk and the relative risk.
    Newcombe RG; Bender R
    Evid Based Med; 2014 Feb; 19(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 23970740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating risk difference from relative association measures in meta-analysis can infrequently pose interpretational challenges.
    Murad MH; Montori VM; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):865-7. PubMed ID: 19230610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculating confidence intervals for impact numbers.
    Hildebrandt M; Bender R; Gehrmann U; Blettner M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():32. PubMed ID: 16836748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [GRADE guidelines: 12. Developing Summary of Findings tables - dichotomous outcomes].
    Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):646-64. PubMed ID: 24315336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Point and interval estimation of baseline risk and treatment effect based on logistic model for observational studies.
    Wang X; Yin L
    Biom J; 2015 May; 57(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 25810034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.
    Uno H; Cai T; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Wei LJ
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(10):1105-17. PubMed ID: 21484848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.
    Shao K; Gift JS
    Risk Anal; 2014 Jan; 34(1):101-20. PubMed ID: 23758102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple method of determining confidence intervals for population attributable risk from complex surveys.
    Natarajan S; Lipsitz SR; Rimm E
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3229-39. PubMed ID: 17309113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved estimates of floating absolute risk.
    Plummer M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 14695642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainty in the minimum event risk to justify treatment was evaluated.
    Walter SD; Sinclair JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):816-24. PubMed ID: 19216053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Santesso N; Helfand M; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Norris S; Meerpohl J; Djulbegovic B; Alonso-Coello P; Post PN; Busse JW; Glasziou P; Christensen R; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 66(2):158-72. PubMed ID: 22609141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistics review 11: assessing risk.
    Bewick V; Cheek L; Ball J
    Crit Care; 2004 Aug; 8(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 15312212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radon exposure assessment and dosimetry applied to epidemiology and risk estimation.
    Puskin JS; James AC
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):193-208. PubMed ID: 16808608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GRADE the evidence before using the results in clinical practice.
    Tharyan P
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2011; 8(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 22106600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.
    Bender R
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Apr; 22(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 11306148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strong compound-risk factors: efficient discovery through emerging patterns and contrast sets.
    Li J; Yang Q
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2007 Sep; 11(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 17912971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.
    Schafer DW; Gilbert ES
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):303-12. PubMed ID: 16808615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.