These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2397114)
1. Comparison between Bactec Nr. 660 and a conventional 12-tube blood culture system. Nir M; Prag J; Jensen J; Arpi M APMIS; 1990 Jul; 98(7):645-51. PubMed ID: 2397114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of detection speed and yield in BACTEC NR-860 and Roche BCB blood culture systems. Arpi M; Bremmelgaard A APMIS; 1993 Jul; 101(7):545-50. PubMed ID: 8398094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of a new automated infrared blood culture system with the BACTEC 460 system. Jungkind D; Millan J; Allen S; Dyke J; Hill E J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Feb; 23(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 3084548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections. Cockerill FR; Reed GS; Hughes JG; Torgerson CA; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Dale JC; Roberts GD; Ilstrup DM; Henry NK J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 35(6):1469-72. PubMed ID: 9163464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the automated Bactec NR-660 with a conventional blood culture system. van Elsacker-Niele AM; Lichtendahl-Bernards AT; Hermans J; Vandenbroucke JP; Mouton RP Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Aug; 8(8):724-6. PubMed ID: 2506041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood. Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of a conventional and a radio-metric examination of clinical blood cultures with respect to recovery rate and detection time of microorganisms. Arpi M; Lester A; Frederiksen W Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1985 Aug; 93(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 3901666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of a blood culture inoculation technique on detection of bacteremia by the BACTEC system. Carlson LG; Plorde JJ J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Sep; 16(3):590-2. PubMed ID: 6752196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of agitation and terminal subcultures on yield and speed of detection of the Oxoid Signal blood culture system versus the BACTEC radiometric system. Weinstein MP; Mirrett S; Reimer LG; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Mar; 27(3):427-30. PubMed ID: 2654178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prospective, comparative study of a infrared spectroscopic blood culture system (Bactec NR-660)]. Voss A; Machka K; Braveny I Immun Infekt; 1989 Jun; 17(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 2759654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resin versus standard blood culture media used with the new BACTEC automated infrared system: an evaluation in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Kern W; Kirchner S; Vanek E Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1990 Jun; 273(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 2400531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlled evaluation of supplemented peptone and Bactec blood culture broths for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Reimer LG; McDaniel JD; Mirrett S; Reller LB; Wang WL J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 3988898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of BACTEC automated blood culture system and conventional system in hospitalized pediatric patients. Chokephaibulkit K; Sitthitrai P; Wanprapa N; Chearskul S; Srifuengfung S; Pingwang B; Dhiraputra C J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Oct; 82(10):1011-6. PubMed ID: 10561964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of oxoid signal with nonradiometric BACTEC NR-660 for detection of bacteremia. Schwabe LD; Randall EL; Miller-Catchpole R; Squires CI; Gottschall RL Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2331847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An appropriately performed conventional blood culture can facilitate choice of therapy in resource-constrained settings-comparison with BACTEC 9050. Surase PV; Nataraj G; Pattamadai K; Mehta PR; Pazare AR; Agarwal MC; Nanavati RN J Postgrad Med; 2016; 62(4):228-234. PubMed ID: 27763479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid detection of positive blood cultures with the BACTEC NR-660 does not require first-day subculturing. Levi MH; Gialanella P; Motyl MR; McKitrick JC J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Nov; 26(11):2262-5. PubMed ID: 3069859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of non-radiometric BACTEC NR 660 system for routine detection of bacteremia. Farina C; Grigis A; Raglio A; Moioli F; Goglio A Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1989; 68(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 2491430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter comparison of the high volume (10 ml) NR BACTEC PLUS system and the standard (5 ml) NR BACTEC system. Koontz FP; Flint KK; Reynolds JK; Allen SD Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 1873969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Routine evaluation of the nonradiometric BACTEC NR 660 system. Courcol RJ; Fruchart A; Roussel-Delvallez M; Martin GR J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jul; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 3522625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of radiometric system for detecting bacteremia. Renner ED; Gatheridge LA; Washington JA Appl Microbiol; 1973 Sep; 26(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 4584580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]