These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization. Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metamemory and prospective memory in Parkinson's disease. Smith SJ; Souchay C; Moulin CJ Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 21928905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes? Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance. McBride DM; Abney DH Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):190-8. PubMed ID: 22411182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ongoing task delays affect prospective memory more powerfully than filler task delays. Martin BA; Brown NL; Hicks JL Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21443330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory. Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both? Rummel J; Smeekens BA; Kane MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1047-1062. PubMed ID: 27936845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task. Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance. Thomas BJ; McBride DM Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]