These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23971415)

  • 1. Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference.
    Lourenço JS; Maylor EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 23971415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.
    Lourenço JS; White K; Maylor EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1757-64. PubMed ID: 23834056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The specificity of prospective memory costs.
    Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Hirschhorn E; Sobin Y; Gollwitzer PM
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):848-64. PubMed ID: 22900905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
    Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metamemory and prospective memory in Parkinson's disease.
    Smith SJ; Souchay C; Moulin CJ
    Neuropsychology; 2011 Nov; 25(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 21928905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.
    Rummel J; Kuhlmann BG; Touron DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 23703025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective memory in context: Moving through a familiar space.
    Smith RE; Hunt RR; Murray AE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 27504679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective memory and task interference in a continuous monitoring dynamic display task.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 20565199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions.
    Beck SM; Ruge H; Walser M; Goschke T
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 52():37-50. PubMed ID: 24200918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural basis for successful encoding and retrieval of prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Guo C; Jiang Y
    Sci China Life Sci; 2011 Jun; 54(6):580-7. PubMed ID: 21706420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
    Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of transfer-appropriate processing and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance.
    McBride DM; Abney DH
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):190-8. PubMed ID: 22411182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ongoing task delays affect prospective memory more powerfully than filler task delays.
    Martin BA; Brown NL; Hicks JL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 21443330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both?
    Rummel J; Smeekens BA; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1047-1062. PubMed ID: 27936845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.