217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23971492)
1. Equiprobable and oddball paradigms: two approaches for documenting auditory discrimination.
Key AP; Yoder PJ
Dev Neuropsychol; 2013; 38(6):402-17. PubMed ID: 23971492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds.
Pakarinen S; Lovio R; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Näätänen R; Kujala T
Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 19646504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory phoneme discrimination in illiterates: mismatch negativity--a question of literacy?
Schaadt G; Pannekamp A; van der Meer E
Dev Psychol; 2013 Nov; 49(11):2179-90. PubMed ID: 23379298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Event-related potential features indexing central auditory discrimination by newborns.
Ceponiene R; Kushnerenko E; Fellman V; Renlund M; Suominen K; Näätänen R
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 11867255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?
Sheehan KA; McArthur GM; Bishop DV
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 16198089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linguistic multifeature MMN paradigm for extensive recording of auditory discrimination profiles.
Partanen E; Vainio M; Kujala T; Huotilainen M
Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1372-80. PubMed ID: 21564122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Korczak PA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing two things at once: neurophysiological indices of speech segregation and identification.
Alain C; Reinke K; He Y; Wang C; Lobaugh N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):811-8. PubMed ID: 15904547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phonological but not auditory discrimination is impaired in dyslexia.
Paul I; Bott C; Heim S; Wienbruch C; Elbert TR
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 24(10):2945-53. PubMed ID: 17116164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral-temporal EEG dynamics of speech discrimination processing in infants during sleep.
Gilley PM; Uhler K; Watson K; Yoshinaga-Itano C
BMC Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 18(1):34. PubMed ID: 28330464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Processing of novel identifiability and duration in children and adults.
Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20959134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deficit in the preattentive processing of syllabic duration and VOT in children with dyslexia.
Chobert J; François C; Habib M; Besson M
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):2044-55. PubMed ID: 22595658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Categorical Perception of Speech (VOT) and Analogous Non-Speech (FOT) signals: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.
Horev N; Most T; Pratt H
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 17204903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of response sharing and stimulus presentation frequency on event-related potentials in an auditory oddball paradigm.
Horváth J; Roeber U; Schröger E
Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):931-41. PubMed ID: 20230495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory hallucinations and the mismatch negativity: processing speech and non-speech sounds in schizophrenia.
Fisher DJ; Labelle A; Knott VJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Oct; 70(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 18511139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurophysiological correlates of auditory and language development: a mismatch negativity study.
Paquette N; Vannasing P; Lefrançois M; Lefebvre F; Roy MS; McKerral M; Lepore F; Lassonde M; Gallagher A
Dev Neuropsychol; 2013; 38(6):386-401. PubMed ID: 23971491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
