194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23971991)
1. Distinct visual cues mediate aperture shaping for grasping and pantomime-grasping tasks.
Holmes SA; Lohmus J; McKinnon S; Mulla A; Heath M
J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23971991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Goal-directed grasping: the dimensional properties of an object influence the nature of the visual information mediating aperture shaping.
Holmes SA; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 23501700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
Hosang S; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The visual coding of grip aperture shows an early but not late adherence to Weber's law.
Heath M; Mulla A; Holmes SA; Smuskowitz LR
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 490(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 21194553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation.
Ayala N; Binsted G; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 29923096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The spatial relations between stimulus and response determine an absolute visuo-haptic calibration in pantomime-grasping.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2017 Jun; 114():29-39. PubMed ID: 28346879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
Ozana A; Ganel T
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law.
Löwenkamp C; Gärtner W; Haus ID; Franz VH
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25731904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.
Heath M; Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():332. PubMed ID: 23267323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Hosang S; Heath M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():91-100. PubMed ID: 25796409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.
Ozana A; Ganel T
Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):977-988. PubMed ID: 28871420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.
Heath M; Manzone J
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 28280878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory.
Ganel T; Freud E; Meiran N
J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.
Bhatia K; Löwenkamp C; Franz VH
J Vis; 2022 Nov; 22(12):13. PubMed ID: 36374493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Violations of Weber's law tell us more about methodological challenges in sensorimotor research than about the neural correlates of visual behaviour.
Schenk T; Utz KS; Hesse C
Vision Res; 2017 Nov; 140():140-143. PubMed ID: 28965858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
